qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 153531084 | over 1 year ago | Hi and welcome!
|
| 153557826 | over 1 year ago | hi, consider using ruins=yes
when the historical value isn't really big. |
| 153490341 | over 1 year ago | Hi, if you are adding speed limits, just keep in mind that winter and summer speed limits may differ. I'd leave the winter one as the default one then add something like: maxspeed:conditional=120 @ (Apr 1-Oct 31) or whatever the dates usually are. It's probably especially hard to determine the values for roads with dynamic displays instead of signs. This one probably also needs
|
| 153344041 | over 1 year ago | Hi, Bvvad Please note that
I've removed the name you've added. You can consult the wiki and beginners guide:
|
| 124535934 | over 1 year ago | Hi, small follow-up on this
|
| 142939729 | over 1 year ago | Hi, about access of this gate.
Just a small heads-up. bicycle=yes and foot=yes override access=private. They shouldn't be added if the access is private. Vehicles can't pass here anyway so they make no sense. I'll fix it, but just so you know for the future that there is a general access tag and others override its value for the particular mode of transport. I've verified that there is a code lock on the gate. |
| 152949387 | over 1 year ago | I don't understand what are you trying to say by that. I also speak Estonian and Russian if that can help. |
| 152911403 | over 1 year ago | @Fedor Filimonov
|
| 152949387 | over 1 year ago | |
| 152949387 | over 1 year ago | Hi, even a shed can have an address. Don't delete unless you're sure. |
| 151988690 | over 1 year ago | removed them |
| 151988690 | over 1 year ago | Hi, those are not natural and man-made. Names are not meant for description. I propose you delete those. Bunker can probably be mapped as an underground building. |
| 151717779 | over 1 year ago | Hi, please check what the tags mean before adding them
It's not a building if there are no walls and no roof. |
| 152189180 | over 1 year ago | Merivälja Südamekodu: Now Merivälja Südamekodu exists in two instances, this is incorrect. If you think that the area is incorrect, remove it. Otherwise remove the node. I think there was car repair service on the same grounds, but if they are accessible to elderly, I think it's ok to leave the area and delete the new node. Pirita: You've deleted the building for some reason. You can restore it by selecting the area and then either clicking on "area" at the top left and selecting a "building" there. Or go the tags section in the bottom left and add building=yes and remove area=yes. |
| 152189721 | over 1 year ago | Hi, please don't add things which are yet not there. Tartu Südamekodu avab uksed septembris 2024. There is a way to add such things for the future, which will be ignored by most data consumers. I'll mark it as planned |
| 152189360 | over 1 year ago | Hi, something really wrong here
|
| 152480904 | over 1 year ago | Hi, if possible, please upload changes in different countries separately in the future, thank you! |
| 152518022 | over 1 year ago | Hi, good edit, but I think it's better to remove the hotel name from the building. We don't map the same thing twice in OpenStreetMap. It already exists as a node with a correct tourism=hotel tag, while the name on the building without such tag is... just the name of the building. Since here is a mess of connected buildings which have different shapes from Maa-amet, this would lead to less confusion. |
| 152019982 | over 1 year ago | Hi, please use Maa-amet's imagery in Estonia. It's usually very precise. There is currently an offset to it. I assume it's an attempt to fix note/4270175 ? |
| 151744694 | over 1 year ago | not really sure about these gardens. not everything inside private property is a garden and especially not the land underneath the house. |