Hello, designated is often used on legally marked bicycle paths. Cycle barriers may also be there for kids who are legally allowed to ride everywhere. Maybe the path should be just bicycle=yes - not forbidden, but also not designated.

Just wanted to share these thoughts, I don't imply you have to change anything, great work!

Hello, I'm reporting your vandalism

Please write changeset descriptions from the beginning

You shouldn't really use google streetview, their license does not allow it. There are mapillary and similar services available in popular places through id editor.

Hey, since you've recently edited that playground, it has some strange
roof:levels, roof:shape, building:levels tags. Do you think they could be removed?

BTW, i suggest you switch to using Esri Clarity and Maaamet Cadastre aerial photos. They are a lot more clear and recent than Bing. Maaamet also has fotoladu, which is not accessible in ID editor, but has recent photos and is nice to check things.
https://fotoladu.maaamet.ee/?basemap=kiirortofoto

Nice find. Been here today. What made you think it is suitable for blind?

Just checked it. Southern path is not blocked and cannot be blocked as it's physically located on a lower level behind a wall. Fixed.

Hello. I think this is a router's problem and a bug report should be submitted to them.

I don't think we have to map such paths. They do not exists in reality. Only one path there has a distinct surface and is visible on the ground and it was already mapped.

highway=pedestrian
"Also other paths such as highway=footway as well as roads have to connect with the edge of the pedestrian area where they intersect. [However, note that few routers will route through the area, most will route around the edge of it.] "

Another way seems to cover deleted part.
way/174097228
So this looks correct.

Hello, aerial imagery suggests that the southern path is not blocked. Are you sure it is? Also, please don't use Bing imagery in Estonia, Esri and Maaamet cadastre are much better.

Note: added foot=yes to a small portion of cycleway for routing. Otherwise it's not possible to leave the bus stop.

Check out note
note/2746734

Typo in "Tallinn". But I think city name should be removed as search tools usually display city name anyway.

Hello, it seems you missed some warnings like way/956951645
path going through the building.

@fghj753
Hello, I've just been looking at some of tetrab0rat's changesets and already contacted him in English here

changeset/104027105

and I see you also contacted him here

changeset/106293283

I didn't assume his changes were malicious though. I can contact him in Russian if required.

What was here before? A lot of parks? Maybe he's a pokemon player? Pokemon go uses OSM data and spawns more pokemons in parks.

Anyway, doesn't lake name suggest that it indeed should be surrounded by a park? Maybe the real park was accidenatlly deleted or should be added?

Hello,

I don't understand why this needs to have a name, the tags already specify that it's a pedestrian path and you can see forest around it.

And what's with the park numbers? Are they named like this in reality too? If they don't have a name, then they shouldn't be named on the map.

Also, name tag should use Estonian language in Estonia, you can specify a Russian name with a name:ru tag.

I see you are using Bing aerial imagery. I'd suggest using Maaamet aerial imagery, as it's a lot more precise.

Hello, it seems that you've changed tagging of a combined pedestrian/bicycle path (kergliiklustee) from footway to cycleway. Aerial imagery from Maaamet shows a combined bicycle-pedestrian crossing.

Cycleway by default is a road where pedestrian traffic is NOT allowed, like on Pirita tee. The correct ways to tag pedestrian/bicycle path are:
1)
highway=footway
bicycle=designated
2)
highway=path
bicycle=designated
foot=designated
3)
highway=cycleway
foot=designated

* Bicycle infrastructure

in the end it seems to have added a node/8773130688. nothing serious.