Da kann ich wenig dazu sagen, ich hatte hier nur einen Tippfehler korrigiert. Wenn sich Leute dafür interessieren könnten, kann man das Objekt sicher auch noch länger in OSM lassen damit es gefunden wird, inklusive dem Verweis auf den neuen Standort. Falsch ist das Löschen aber auch nicht.

Hi Simon,
could you check the boundaries you edited? Several of them got some strange tags on their new ways like this one
way/1355623169

Hi,
"landuse:use" gibt es nicht (weder dokumentiert noch irgendwo benutzt und damit nirgends unterstützt).

Wie das Wiki schreibt ist "greenland" etwas problematisch, weil es nicht die momentane Nutzung beschreibt wie ein übliches "landuse". Mit dem "planned" Prefix haben wir ein gängies Tagging, das sowohl den jetzigen als auch den zukünftigen Status erfasst.

The idea of the tag as I wrote it is that it is indeed open 24/7. The second part defines it do be "open" at any time, just with additional note that no staff is present.

If there is a larger interest in explicitly tagging "hours staff is present for any kind of help or consultation" we can think about properly defining the new tag, but as long as it is only this one station I would use the common opening_hours.

Right. I'll fix that later.

Hi,
Please check the name tags you added. You used the keys 'name-ar' and 'name-en' instead of the correct 'name:ar' and 'name:en'.

Hi,
left/right usually refers to a feature besides the main feature, e.g. a sidewalk on the side of the highway, but not to the left and right half of an object.

While the regulation obviously depends on the left/right half of the road, I think backward/forward is the closest we can get to in OSM using existing tags.

According to wikipedia the standard is
J563-B
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automobile_auxiliary_power_outlet

The spelling "socket:j563-B" with a minor letter fits to the other j-Standards we already have like socket:j3105-2

Reminder:
I found many keys like
correoelec =
telefono =
sitio web =

Please make sure you use the correct tags for these:
email
phone
website

In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.

Could you check this way, it got two strange tags:
way/96007149

I don't see anything special on the (mostly English) signs the wiki article contains.

The destination:arrow tags in the wiki are only helpful if we know the orientation of the sign (unless you want to tag the sign only without relating it to any way close by)

What do you mean by "aren't oriented to cardinals directions"? They need to point in some direction to be useful, and the key we use is one of the eight cardinal directions that is closest to the direction the sign points to.

Hi,
"staffed_hours" is not used up to now. Is there any particular feature that is only available during these hours?

You could use opening_hours for this, like
Mo-Fr 10:00-20:00 || open "no staff present"

Hi,
you used destination:arrows tags here. On destination tags on ways the singular "arrow" is used.

I'd rather suggest to use the "direction_north" tagging scheme - Without the orientation of the sign it is difficult to correctly interpret the direction these arrows are pointing to.

Hi,
it looks like something went wrong with this and the other 20 bicycle service stations you added. They all got very strange tags like "service:bicycle:sada_torx_klíčů_(9,_10,_15,_20,_25,_27,_30,_40_mm)"

Please make sure you only use the common service:bicycle:* tags and don't paste long descriptions into the key.

Hi,
something went wrong here. Most of these nodes don't have any valid tag.

I suggest to revert this changeset, so that the shops can be added properly one by one with correct tags.

Hi,
could you check this building? It seems to small for a warehouse, to large for a give_box, and 'cans' is not used anywhere else.
way/1201806251/history

Hi,
the tag "card_lock" is not used in any other places. What do you want to tag? A payment or authentication method?

Hi,
was meinst du mit charging:adhoc?
Wäre das nicht eventuell
authentication:none=yes

Hi,
when you update parking tags, it might be better not to try to change these 13 year old tags like
parking:lane:both:capacity:free:hourly:winter
I think we can be sure that they are totally outdated and don't serve any purpose despite documenting past attempts to tag free capacities.

Was ist das denn für eine Chemnitzer Spezialität und was soll es bedeuten? Das habe ich noch nie irgendwo gesehen. Der längeren Anfahrt zur B 169/173 nach zu urteilen ist das doch nichts anderes als ein destination:ref:to?