mueschel's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 161719082 | 11 months ago | Hallo,
|
| 161715688 | 11 months ago | Hi,
|
| 161669112 | 11 months ago | I think the pictures you show me fit well for
There seems to be symbol of a cooking pot on the container, but I don't think we have a tag for this yet. |
| 161669112 | 11 months ago | No, I didn't get another message. |
| 161669112 | 11 months ago | Hi,
|
| 161695058 | 11 months ago | Hi,
Please make sure you use the correct tags for these:
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps. |
| 161623797 | 11 months ago | Hi,
|
| 161607477 | 11 months ago | Hi,
|
| 161528716 | 11 months ago | Hi,
|
| 161546812 | 11 months ago | Hi,
|
| 161532793 | 11 months ago | You can always enter tags manually in the "Properties" section using the "+" sign. E.g. for a salt marsh, the wiki names the right tags:
If you have question about tagging, the best place to ask is the forums - maybe show an example and ask for tagging suggestions.
|
| 161532793 | 11 months ago | Hi,
habitat 1
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Also: The "name" tag is only for the actual name of an object, not for a description. |
| 161506714 | 11 months ago | Generating a warning would be slightly complicated, because both versions could be correct: phone:ES for a number available only in Spain
|
| 161486761 | 11 months ago | Hi,
|
| 161506714 | 11 months ago | Hi,
|
| 157222604 | 11 months ago | Ich würde den Unsinn als Beleg dafür werten, dass die Beschilderung wie sie im Augenblick ist, nicht so gedacht war und sich eventuell noch ändert. |
| 161493211 | 11 months ago | Objects with the tags @id and id are always duplicates due to uploading objects that have been exported to geojson files before. Checking again I see that you deleted some of the original objects before. I'm sure I found duplicates yesterday, but now it seems like I was mistaken. I'll revert this and remove the id/@id tags. |
| 161277026 | 11 months ago | With so many exceptions it might be even better to not use oneway tags at all and simply use access restrictions: bicycle:backward = yes
|
| 161455432 | 11 months ago | Hi,
|
| 161398687 | 11 months ago | hi,
The various topics can be added to the social_facility tag using a list of values, separated by semicolons. Could you check whether this common tagging scheme is applicable? |