Ooh, now I get it, the main issue is the clockwise/anticlockwise confusion!

You’re welcome!

However, I’m still curious as to which “older software” doesn’t support standalone junction=roundabout tagging. On the Forum, you’ve already mentioned scientific studies, but here, you referred to software in particular.

Have a nice day!

Thanks for the info, I’ll consider this in the future.
Should I re-add oneway=yes to the roundabouts where I removed it? Or is it sufficient to leave it untouched wherever I encounter it?

[Français en dessous]

I think something went wrong at way/1427966242: The right primary road should connect to the junction center, not the footway crossing.

I’ve fixed the issue for you: changeset/171730377

----

Je pense que quelque chose a mal tourné sur way/1427966242: La bonne route principale devrait se connecter au centre de jonction, pas au passage à pied.

J'ai résolu le problème pour vous: changeset/171730377

Dieses Tag muss mal gründlich diskutiert werden (bevorzugt auf Englisch): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/composting-plant-as-new-id-tagging-schema-kompostierungsanlage-als-neues-id-taggingschema/130729

Hinweis: Alternative Schreibweisen sollten in das Tag alt_name=* geschrieben werden und nicht in name:de=*. Ich habe die entsprechende Korrektur für dich vorgenommen.

The OSRM debug map shows that Fox Talbot Close is missing from the bike routing graph:
https://map.project-osrm.org/debug/bike.html#19.36/51.45283/-0.98215

Maybe OSRM didn’t update the bicycle routing graph yet.

Maybe access=permissive is treated like access=private for bike routing. If that’s the case, it should be reported to the OSRM developers as that doesn’t make sense.

[español al final]

Excuse me, but this map entry of yours doesn’t make much sense to me. What did you intend with this?
Some of my questions:
• Did you intend this to be a school (a place where students get education) or do you mean something else with “escuela”?
• What does the tag highway=rio_al_aguariaco mean?
• You specified supposedly English and Japanese names, but these are also written in Spanish.
• You added various other names which seem to be thought up by you.
• You have linked “Calle de Mejía Lequerica” as Wikipedia and Wikidata entries for this object, which is a street in Madrid, Spain – completely unrelated to this place!

Perdone, pero esta entrada suya en el mapa no tiene mucho sentido para mí. ¿Qué pretendías con esto?
Algunas de mis preguntas:
- ¿Pretendías que esto fuera una escuela (un lugar donde los estudiantes reciben educación) o quieres decir algo más con «escuela»?
- ¿Qué significa la etiqueta highway=rio_al_aguariaco?
- Has especificado nombres supuestamente ingleses y japoneses, pero también están escritos en español.
- Has añadido varios nombres más que parecen ideados por ti.
- Has enlazado «Calle de Mejía Lequerica» como entradas de Wikipedia y Wikidata para este objeto, que es una calle de Madrid, España – ¡totalmente sin relación con este lugar!

(Traducción realizada con la versión gratuita del traductor DeepL.com)

[español abajo]

You shouldn’t specify the street name in the highway=* tag – this information is already stored in the address tag addr:street=Fransisco Becerra. highway=* is supposed to be used for the type of the road itself. For example, the street next to the bar is tagged highway=residential and name=Fransisco Becerra.

No debe especificar el nombre de la calle en la etiqueta highway=* – esta información ya está almacenada en la etiqueta de dirección addr:street=Fransisco Becerra. highway=* se supone que se utiliza para el tipo de calle en sí. Por ejemplo, la calle junto al bar tiene la etiqueta highway=residential y name=Fransisco Becerra.

I have a strong passion for fixing mistakes in the OSM database – it’s so much fun! For your information: I found your “highway=2 к8” tagging when I checked the last few pages of https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/highway#values, using overpass turbo to find the location.

Я очень люблю исправлять ошибки в базе данных OSM – это так весело! Для справки: Я нашел вашу метку «highway=2 к8», когда проверял последние несколько страниц https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/highway#values, используя overpass turbo для поиска местоположения.

osm-carto GitHub issue for this topic:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1953

You may continue discussion there as long as it’s related to map rendering.

Unfortunately, it is really difficult to come to a conclusion with the osm-carto maintainers since the project is in a suboptimal state when it comes to organization and participation.

Oops, I wanted to write: “Added buildings from #OzonGeo cadastre”

Упс, я хотел написать: «Добавлены здания из кадастра #OzonGeo».

Also, instead of just “#OzonGeo”, you should write in your changeset comment something like “Added buildings from #OzonGeo”, this is much more helpful to other mappers like me.

Кроме того, вместо простого «#OzonGeo», вы должны написать в комментарии к набору изменений что-то вроде «Добавлены здания из #OzonGeo», это будет гораздо полезнее для других мапперов вроде меня.

I have also added a missing addr:city=Москва to one of the buildings (way/1381058521).

Я также добавил недостающее значение addr:city=Москва в одно из зданий (way/1381058521).

You have added toll gantry information to a motorway exit, using the tag highway=motorway_junction;toll_gantry.

Different features should be tagged on separate objects. For this reason, I have split up the node so that the original node (node/99016139) is only a motorway junction, while the new node (node/12791620531) contains all of your toll gantry information. I have also placed the toll gantry node very close to the motorway junction node.

Link to my changeset:
changeset/165505736#map=18/25.782036/-80.323641

[Русский язык ниже]

way/1381058518
On this building, you have tagged “highway=2 к8” in addition to the “8 к2” housenumber. highway=* doesn’t belong on buildings as it’s used for roads.
Also, there are duplicated housenumbers: “8 к2” appears on four buildings. Where did you get the housenumbers from?

way/1381058518
На этом здании вы отметили «highway=2 к8» в дополнение к номеру дома «8 к2». highway=* не относится к зданиям, так как используется для дорог.
Кроме того, дублируются номера домов: «8 к2» встречается на четырех зданиях. Откуда вы взяли номера домов?

I’ve added a comment to a German forum topic from 2022 about this tagging issue:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/standseilbahn-oder-schragaufzug/94981/9

Should I create a new, English-language forum topic for this so that you understand what is being discussed?

One question: Is the public (or a delivery driver) allowed to enter Fox Talbot Close if they ring the bell next to the gate? If yes, it’s likely a case for access=destination or access=permissive, NOT access=private.

(access=private means “No trespassing” or “You must be a specific person e.g. with a key to enter here.”)

The issue might be solved by changing “Fox Talbot Close” to access=destination or vehicle=delivery or such.

Do you mean that these directions are incorrect?
osm.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=51.452416%2C-0.982936%3B51.452738%2C-0.982094

If yes, this is expected behavior for OSRM and GraphHopper: “Fox Talbot Close” is tagged as private and ignored by these two routers for bicycle/foot routing. And “Epping Close” happens to be closer to the destination than “Baker Street”.

Valhalla does route the correct way:
osm.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_foot&route=51.452416%2C-0.982936%3B51.452738%2C-0.982094#map=19/51.452771/-0.982559

You might consider changing “Fox Talbot Close” to access=destination (and also set access=destination on the gate), but ONLY if the public can enter for a visit.