node/12237593988
Mapping staircases on nodes is not correct, please split the way and add the steps where they are located on the ground.

highway=funicular (as it was tagged previously) is not rendered either.

railway=funicular is, in fact, rendered, but it has the wrong meaning in this case – please take a look at: osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Ich hatte damals wohl irgendwie Teständerungen durchgeführt und diese warum-auch-immer in die OSM-Datenbank hochgeladen …

Da hatte ich damals wohl irgendwie Teständerungen durchgeführt und diese warum-auch-immer in die OSM-Datenbank hochgeladen …

Excuse me, but “highway=Major Collector” is not a proper road type in OpenStreetMap. Please stick to the well-defined road types you can find at highway=* because these are understood by routing apps and other software (including the map renderer).
I have changed the road back to highway=secondary.

Removing the road number (ref) was correct though, thanks for that.

Are you sure the garden shed and the paths exist where you drew them? I can only see the “fish pond” and grass on Bing Aerial.

You have accidentally tagged a road segment with highway=unclassified;service – I’ve fixed that for you.

您不小心将一个路段标记为 highway=unclassified;service -- 我已为您修复。

What was your intention when you changed this highway=unclassified into highway=winter? The way is already tagged with ice_road=yes, which means it’s only usable while the river is frozen.
way/653346633

Footway bridges should be tagged highway=footway with bridge=yes. You had tagged highway=bridge, which is incorrect. I have now fixed it for you.

Bist du sicher, der Parkplatz relation/10339047 ist öffentlich (access=yes)?

Falls ja: Ändere bitte das Multipolygon und auch alle Parkplatzwege auf access=yes.

Falls nein, brauchst du nichts zu tun. Ich habe den Parkplatz auf access=customers (nur für Kunden) geändert.

Du kannst auch meinen Changeset diskutieren: changeset/164539869

Since this is a complex topic, I have decided to start a discussion on the Community Forum:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/a-danish-mapper-with-a-unique-view-on-3d-tagging/127022

You’re welcome to join the discussion!

Ich war heute (27. Februar) hier und konnte an der Seite der Zufahrtsstraße keinen Parkplatz auffinden – da sind nur Baumstämme.
note/4643999

P.S.: In 3. where I wrote “elaborate 3D mapping”, I meant:
“but only building=* has such an elaborate 3D mapping and tagging scheme”, referring to osm.wiki/OSM-4D/3D_building

I respect your intentions to create a 3D representation of this private property (probably your home), however, your usage of OSM tags partially counts as tagging for a specific renderer, F4map in your case. Consider: osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Also look at my changeset just before this one for better context: changeset/162656640

I commend the geometric level of detail, but I want to express my opinion (which might be flawed) about some tags:
1. Instead of landuse=driveway, better use area:highway=service and something like area:service=driveway to draw the area of an access road. Plus, you should also draw the center line, in this case highway=service with service=driveway.
2. The key height=* should not be used for the elevation of the steps relative to “the normal ground” – or maybe it should be? Not very sure about this anymore; I did change height=* to ele:relative=* in my first changeset, though.
3. Regarding the structures in the garden, which you mapped as building=portal with 3D building tags. I didn’t touch these, since I realized a conflict of interest: building=* is not fitting for such a structure (something like man_made=portal fits better), but only building=* has such an elaborate 3D mapping
4. The main topic of discussion: the staircase. It’s really diligent of you to map every single step as a rectangle, but building and building:part are really not the right tag keys for this since staircases are not buildings by themselves – they’re highways. For that reason, I changed each of the steps to area:highway=steps and the level parts of the staircase to area:highway=footway. After doing that and adding highway centerlines, I didn’t see any purpose in the enclosing building=stair polygon and deleted it.

Tagging in OpenStreetMap can sometimes be complicated and both of us having differing opinions is perfectly normal.

Have a nice day!
— keepright! ler

way/436071594

[Chinese/中文]
building=yWa Kok 是什么意思？这应该是大楼的名字吗？

[English]
What did you mean with building=yWa Kok? Is this supposed to be the name of the building?

Zum Zeitpunkt meines Changesets war die Website offline und auf speisekarte.menu hieß es: »Dieses Restaurant ist dauerhaft geschlossen.«

Inzwischen ist die Website wieder online und das Restaurant in Betrieb – danke für die Korrektur!

Für way/324222304 (den ich basierend auf dem anderen Weg ebenfalls fälschlich als motor_vehicle=destination getaggt hatte) gibt es nun von mir den folgenden Changeset: changeset/157621882

Korrektur-Changeset: changeset/157590901

Oops, mein Foto bezieht sich tatsächlich auf die rechte Anliegerstraße (highway=service) und NICHT auf den links danebenliegenden Wirtschaftsweg (highway=track). Ich bitte um Entschuldigung.

Ich ändere jetzt die Wege entsprechend.

Vor Ort steht am östlichen Ende von way/517059264 folgende Schilderkombi (von oben nach unten):
1. Zeichen 260
Verbot für Kraft­fahrzeuge
2. Zusatzzeichen 1026-36
Landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr frei
3. Zusatzzeichen 1020-30
Anlieger frei

Dies als motor_vehicle=agricultural;destination zu mappen wäre semantisch korrekt, wird aber von Routern meist nicht verstanden – siehe https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/motor-vehicle-agricultural-forestry-funktioniert-in-verbreiteten-routern-und-navis-nicht-losungsvorschlag/98681 …

Soll ich trotzdem motor_vehicle=agricultural;destination taggen?