Hello,
We are quite puzzled about some of your edits. Not sure whether those are mistakes.

"Standbeelden zonder naam (deel 1)": is that how the artist named his work? A real name? Or you saw that artwork and didn’t see a name? In that case, we have appropriate tags such as noname=yes.
But I prefer to ask before deleting what we believe is incorrect data on the map.

Same goes for "Koning Boudewijn I standbeeld". There is artwork_type=bust, that should be enough. Is the "standbeeld" really part of the official name of the artwork? Also, you seem to insist that the names of everything is exclusively in Dutch, was that intended?

Hello,
"Villa gallo-romaine", is that a name or just a description?
Also, the previous mapper had used a name exclusively in Dutch, which is incorrect, and you changed it into French but while erasing the Dutch version (this is incorrect too).

Any thoughts? If you were there, maybe you remembered what it was like.
Thanks.

Hallo,
"Steen in de vorm van een omgekeerde piramide"
Is dit de officiële naam van dit kunstwerk of een beschrijving?

Hello,
Good. Very few trees have a name but this one deserves it.
Just one thing: the spelling looks quite unusual, in both languages. And it should rather not be all upper case.

Very good, thanks, and congrats for the move.
I closed the old location and imported its data—website, opening hours, contact details—onto the new one. If anything is no longer relevant, feel free to edit it.

Hello,
When you use highway=construction, do not forget to always use construction=* along with it (highway=construction)
construction=cycleway?

Hello,
We had to revert your change.
The two restaurants you created are duplicates of existing data.
I suggest you update your data source before editing the map, that would help you avoiding that mistake again.

Hello,
Same as the one around the corner?
node/2505417289

Hello,
What kind of shop is this "Papillon"?
shop=yes is incomplete → it should use the proper category (clothes, convenience, or whatever).

Hello,

Just one thing with the tags for this one: way/838334799/history

This is a shared space for pedestrians and cyclists.
oneway=yes is used by some routers and will prevent pedestrians from using it contraflow → oneway:bicycle=yes is better here. :-)

I also added bicycle access tags on zebra crossings, otherwise cycle routing was broken (some engines won’t use footways if they have no bicycle tags).
In Belgian law, it is technically not prohibited cycling on a zebra crossing—vehicles only have to yield to pedestrians, though. I used bicycle=permissive, that should be enough. If you have a better idea, feel free.

Hello,
Adding service roads is nice.
Your new road should have an intersection node with the footway it crosses. This yields validation issues.
I found the same mistake for several dozens of other service roads you added in the last months. We are patiently trying to fix your mistakes.
Would you please be so kind as to care for this issue in your future edits.
Thanks.

Hello,
We had to revert your changeset.
Adding addr:city and addr:postcode on streets themselves is not necessary, we have associatedStreet relations and existing boundaries for that purpose.
It looks like your account is used for mechanical edits over Wallonia, almost all with the same title, leaving other mappers to guess your real intentions. But this is outside WalOnMap boundaries here, this is the Brussels-Capital Region.

Hello,
Welcome to OSM.
Please be extremely careful when editing the map: you have deleted the bus stop for STIB/MIVB 75. Do not do that, please.
I restored it.

Hello,
Do not forget to fill the name field too, this is the most important one. ;-)

Hello,
We had to revert your change.
Contrary to cities, translations for places or streets do not go to the main "name" tag. We only use alt_name for informal translations.
Next time, if you are unsure, please create a note or ask the local community first, especially when dealing with large objects on your first contributions.
Thanks and happy mapping. :-)

Hello,
Would you please be so kind and provide a more descriptive title for your changes.
This would help other mappers see what you meant to do. Otherwise, we must dig through a large heap of data to find out what you changed on the map.

Hello,
Thanks for this but please do not forget to create nodes when your new roads intersect existing ways, e.g. cycleways. I spotted the same mistake on other changesets too. In the mean time, I fixed it.

There is no supermarket named "marche de l'abattoir" on Quai de Mariemont/Mariemontkaai.
I presume you meant the marketplace here, which is already on the map: way/263981325

Your edit has been erased because you created duplicates of existing information.

Hello,
You have been dealing with complex underground infrastructure here. If there are problems with layer tags, please study the situation or discuss it with local community first instead of playing with level values in iD until it gives no warnings. The result is a lot of nonsense now.
Also, would you please be so kind as use a proper title for your edits: merely writing "edit" gives no information about why you wanted to change data on the map.
Thanks.