bxl-forever's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 177192453 | 10 days ago | Hello, I see you wanted a review. A good point for providing a clear description of what you edited, thanks for this. Same comment as changeset/177192782 : Your edit clearly does two completely different things, and on locations several hundreds kilometers apart. Please never do this as a single upload. There is no magic system that will split it in two parts; if you ask for one single upload, then you will have one single upload. Which is now showing as a huge rectangle on the map. This giant changeset is very annoying because it covers most of Belgium and even spans across neighbouring countries. Also, you might want to know that buildings should never be traced from aerial imagery. You damaged a few buildings in Terneuzen, despite those buildings were clearly labelled as having been imported from the BAG registry. Buildings in the NL have tags like this.
Please never trace or redraw buildings on aerial imagery. Those pictures are distorted and do not show you the real outline on the ground. Map data may be outdated in some places, but only the vector geometries provided by governments are correct. Happy mapping. |
| 177192782 | 10 days ago | Hello, and welcome to OSM. Please do not bundle a barn in Terneuzen and a give-way sign in Wallonia within the same upload. Your edit creates a large bounding box that covers most of Belgium, for no reason. The correct way to edit OSM is to work on *one* area, then upload it. And only then, move elsewhere on the map and start working on the second edit. Also, the give-way sign should never be on the node where the two roads intersect (node/300962905). Drivers on the main road will be presented with a give-way sign. This is plainly incorrect. |
| 177139918 | 11 days ago | Je pense qu’il y a une erreur ici : les bâtiments tracés d’après les plans du cadastre ne doivent surtout pas être redessinés à la main en suivant les images aériennes. Ces images donnent toujours une vision déformée des bâtiments et ne sont pas pérennes car la déformation change à chaque nouvelle photo. Attention à ne pas introduire des données fausses dans OSM, svp. |
| 177058436 | 13 days ago | Hello, and welcome to OSM. Thanks for spotting that a house number was missing here. I fixed your edit because you forgot to write the Dutch version of the street name, which is mandatory. Also, we no longer repeat the post code and the town name on every single address in Belgium, because OSM is a geographical database, which already has this information from container areas. Happy mapping. |
| 176814201 | 19 days ago | ## REVERTED CHANGESET Only Bruxelles-Propreté/Net Brussels collects glass bottles. One of the objects you changed here is an "Oxfam" container. You changed "recycling:clothes" into "recycling:glass_bottles". Sorry but Oxfam does not collect glass bottles, we don’t believe this edit can be true. The name of the operator is shown on your screen when StreetComplete asks the question. Please be more careful in the future. Thanks. |
| 176700150 | 21 days ago | OK, deleted, thanks for the reply. |
| 176700150 | 22 days ago | Hello, Containers operated by Oliobox are solely for cooking oil. I noticed that you retagged the Oliobox as if it was now accepting glass bottles: node/8948462242/history
Probably a mistake, because in the same change you also (correctly) confirmed the existing pair of glass containers. Do you remember what containers were here? If you can describe what you saw (in particular, is the orange Oliobox container still here), I will fix the data here. Thanks in advance. |
| 176667472 | 23 days ago | ## REVERTED CHANGESET
Referring to the discussion here: changeset/176667472 (This is a standard notice put on every reverted changeset, to inform other maintainers that the problem has been solved.) -- Tous les changements d'aujourd'hui ont été corrigés (nodes), les ways sont inchangés. Bonne continuation sur OSM. |
| 176667480 | 23 days ago | ## REVERTED CHANGESET
Referring to the discussion here: changeset/176667472 (This is a standard notice put on every reverted changeset, to inform other maintainers that the problem has been solved.) |
| 176667584 | 23 days ago | ## REVERTED CHANGESET
Referring to the discussion here: changeset/176667472 (This is a standard notice put on every reverted changeset, to inform other maintainers that the problem has been solved.) |
| 176667595 | 23 days ago | ## REVERTED CHANGESET
Referring to the discussion here: changeset/176667472 (This is a standard notice put on every reverted changeset, to inform other maintainers that the problem has been solved.) |
| 176667606 | 23 days ago | ## REVERTED CHANGESET
Referring to the discussion here: changeset/176667472 (This is a standard notice put on every reverted changeset, to inform other maintainers that the problem has been solved.) |
| 176667617 | 23 days ago | ## REVERTED CHANGESET
Referring to the discussion here: changeset/176667472 (This is a standard notice I plan to put on every reverted changeset, to inform other maintainers that the problem has been solved.) |
| 176671800 | 23 days ago | ## REVERTED CHANGESET
Referring to the discussion here: changeset/176667472 (This is a standard notice I plan to put on every reverted changeset, to inform other maintainers that the problem has been solved.) |
| 176667472 | 23 days ago | Le tag "education=school" doit aller _uniquement_ sur les écoles. Pas sur tous les nœuds composant le contour de l'établissement ! Par exemple ici : node/444590494 SVP ne plus ajouter ce tag de manière automatique partout sans regarder. Ne pas réparer vous-même, on va s'en charger. |
| 176667617 | 23 days ago | ⚠️ You did it wrong!
|
| 176662982 | 23 days ago | Hello, Thanks for this. Was the name of the market only signed in French? I don’t recall spotting a sign with a name here, so it must have been added quite recently. Do you remember what was written on the sign?
|
| 176261246 | 29 days ago | Hello, and welcome to OSM. Even if we appreciate the effort to add buildings, could you please NEVER trace buildings from aerial pictures. Aerial pictures show a distorted view of the reality, those images are ok for roads, grass and the like, but they are not suited for structures that are higher than the ground. Please use "SPW(allonie) PICC numerical imagery" in the editor if you touch buildings. I spend a lot of time today to repair most of the houses + more damage in other changes like this church (way/479683515) or this school (way/479683515). I felt I had to warn you. This is a frequent mistake by people in their early contributions. Better take good habits early, because repairing faulty edits takes a lot of time. Thanks in advance and happy mapping. |
| 176392032 | 29 days ago | Hello, and welcome to OSM. Nice idea to add more buildings. Before you continue, please read this warning. It looks like you are tracing from aerial images. This is not correct. We should never do this on OSM. At least never in developed countries like Belgium. If you want to add houses, please always trace on "Digitaal Vlaanderen GRB" background. This is the basemap showing the correct location of buildings. If you use the online editor, there is a "Background" button on the right-side of the screen. Use this to change the layer and scroll down until you get the correct basemap. Thanks in advance. |
| 176392154 | 29 days ago | ## REVERTED CHANGESET The plumber has been remapped as a single node. OSM is not a place for spam or advertising, we only use fair description of services.
|