OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
177571138 about 19 hours ago

Hello,
I understand what you wanted to do here. However, there were a few problems with the way you modified the map. Please do not write multiple address values on building outlines.
If there are several house numbers inside the same building, addresses must be written as single nodes.
Also, please do not trace buildings from distorted aerial imagery, only vector imagery should be used.
I fixed this edit, no further action is required here. Thanks.

177570896 about 19 hours ago

Zone de rencontre en maintenant le 30 km/h n’est pas possible. Corrigez votre édition svp.

177567806 about 20 hours ago

Hello.

Is this street one-way just for cars or one-way for *everyone*? Your edit suggests cyclists are NOT allowed to ride against the direction of motor traffic, which is very rare in Brussels.

177566603 about 21 hours ago

Panneaux M2 visibles ici
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1522200912221477

Nous avons corrigé : ajout du tag "oneway:bicycle=no".

177566603 about 21 hours ago

Merci pour l’ajout.

Votre changement indique que le sens unique s’applique pour tout le monde y compris pour les cyclistes.

Donc, pas de panneaux M2, c'est bien ça ? Si c’est une erreur, nous pouvons vous aider à corriger.

177566302 about 21 hours ago

Why did you erase Raphael’s excellent work to map cycleways separately here? (Which was been revised 2 months ago according to the latest situation, which differs from what UrbIS imagery shows.)

Merging cycleways and footways may be acceptable in the countryside but it looks like you are bringing us 10 years back in time.

Getting pedestrian navigation to route until the centre point of the intersection here (node/13476624845) looks even more absurd, given than we have mapped footways and crossing in great detail. Looks like a confusion between the difference between pedestrians and cyclists.

Is that a new convention? Did you discuss this way of mapping with other mappers?

Thanks in advance.

177428156 4 days ago

I did not complain about the bilingual name—this part of the change is okay, and it is good news that Cambio finally updated the name of some stations on their website, because in the past we had a problem when they used monolingual names for some of their stations.

As you can see, I solely wrote about the improper use of "Cambio" inside the station’s name. The revert was solely to fix that.

177428156 4 days ago

Please do not change the names of car-sharing station.

In particular, please do *not* add "Cambio" as part of the main name, and do not use addr:* tags on them. Thanks.

177345416 5 days ago

Hello, DCools.

I think there is a problem with this edit, because you added the two Ichtegem Melkerij stops in the same relation (towards Torhout Station).

node/2280073872
node/2280073867

Also, you did not add the role to the objects and you put Ichtegem Melkerij… at the end of the list, just after Torhout Station, as if Ichtegem Melkerij was served last. This does not make sense to me, and now this line is invalid and will disappear from apps.

Thanks.

177350281 6 days ago

!!! SVP ne pas toucher au métro avec l'éditeur iD.
Grosses erreurs dans ce changeset. Je reverte les géométries.

177238466 7 days ago

Hello,

Can you please explain how "Kilometerhok E41541" relates to what you are doing here?

You are often using cryptic changeset titles or re-using the same title for several—usually unrelated—changes, like this one which you used no less than 25 times in the past 3 days.

Can we please insist again that you start writing real changeset titles that correctly describe the intent of how you want to change the map?

Thanks in advance.

177226994 9 days ago

Hello,

Can you please review the shape of the building you have just added here: way/1467099269

It looks like you are tracing from… aerial pictures instead of using the GRB vector basemap, resulting in houses away from their real locations.

Thanks.

177201532 9 days ago

I think there is something wrong with this edit.

This forest path in Sweden: way/33146743/history

This building in France: way/122846267/history

This street in Sacramento, California:
way/10500786/history

… are all part of your bulk name change, and they are probably incorrect, because it looks like your edit was aimed at changing names on Indonesian roads.

Please review this edit. At least those 3 objects should be reverted to their previous state.