OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
156614634 over 1 year ago

Bonjour,,

De quelles « corrections » s'agit-il précisément ?

Par exemple, je vois que vous transformez les chemins ouverts aux véhicules de service vers chemins uniquement pour piétons/cyclistes/cavaliers. Navigation pour véhicules de service impossible. Est-ce que ça veut dire que maintenant les véhicules de service n'ont plus de possibilité de passer sur ces chemins ? Ils semblent larges et asphaltés.

Aussi, "highway=footway" désigne un chemin uniquement pour piétons, comme ici : way/80141330 C’est bien mais pourquoi garder "foot=yes" additionnellement ? Ne pas mélanger deux systèmes de tagging car ça détériore la qualité générale de la database.

Thanks in advance.

156583712 over 1 year ago

Hello,

Adding Korean translations of cities or regions is fine, but please avoid changing multiple places within the same upload. If you edit names in Canada, South-America and India and upload them at once, it generates an unpleasant giant bounding box covering half of the planet.
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Next time: one place = one upload, please.

Thanks in advance.

156536672 over 1 year ago

Thanks but please do not repeat addresses on POI. The address was already set on the container building itself; adding duplicate values serves no purpose and corrupt the database.
We fixed your edit.

153344935 over 1 year ago

Ne pas ajouter les arrêts n'importe comment dans la relation bus, svp. Il faut toujours veiller à garder les arrêts dans le bon ordre. Vous avez mis l’arrêt Ten Brielen Christ tout à la fin de la liste, c’est incorrect.

156446206 over 1 year ago

Hello,

I really need to alert you now: all those edits where you "restructure" or "update" major roads are too often breaking existing relations, in particular bus routes.

Splitting or merging ways is normally safe in the online iD editor, but if you draw road segments manually you may risk breaking things. I cannot help but notice that your edits must always be followed by people who must tidy up and repair everything.

Have you considered switching to a more advanced editing software like JOSM?

156410464 over 1 year ago

Hello,

Adding a missing building is fine, thanks for this.
But remember: we *never* trace buildings solely on aerial imagery in Belgium, this makes no sense. Use the GRB basemap for buildings.
Also, we do not repeat city names and postcodes on addresses.
We fixed your edits.

156133960 over 1 year ago

It has very wide opening hours, from 06:00 to 22:00 except on Sundays. Fixed.

156351932 over 1 year ago

OK, thanks.

No problem of course with the tag itself, which is correctly documented on the wiki.

My concern was to make sure that you were not importing a proprietary database or a directory of places into OSM, which is not allowed. This is because your editing pattern looked quite similar to what we have seen in the past. If you are mostly opening websites or social media pages of various places to check this by yourself, I guess it will be fine.

If I see more places that regularly offer live music, I will add the tag too. :-)

156351932 over 1 year ago

Hello

Pardon my curiosity but I noticed you are massively adding this tag on several places in various countries in Europe.

Did you survey all those places yourself or are you importing a database? Would you mind telling us where does the source data come from?

Thanks in advance.

156349266 over 1 year ago

Hello,

I am not sure that alnnost "mechanically" changing every occurrence of amenity=square into place=square is useful.

Yes, amenity=square is definitely a tag error and should not exist. But if you take this example, way/1247481865 which you retagged already has "highway=pedestrian", "area=yes" and a name, so the additional tag does not bring any benefit. Even worse: had you inspected the object correctly, you would have found out it is inside a multipolygon with place=square.

So, now, after your changeset we have a really strange situation with nested place=square areas. IMHO it should be corrected: tag place=square on the outer area only, remove the tag from the pedestrian area and remove the multipolygon itself, which was not correct.

156230645 over 1 year ago

Hello,
Crossings should not be split at random places, the best practice is to split crossings on the edge of the tactile paving. And I think that making the middle of crossing look like a bridge is plainly incorrect.
way/1313493106
Anything special here?

156180555 over 1 year ago

Hello,

Is it really "ooghoogte" with no capital letters?

156174182 over 1 year ago

Hello,
Your changeset has been reverted.
The bar is already on the map.
In this changeset you incorrectly renamed… the container building (which hasn’t any "bar" tags). The name was already on the map: node/4361635911
Better luck next time, sorry.

156145154 over 1 year ago

Thanks for your reply, I fixed the tags.

156145154 over 1 year ago

Hello,

Bruxelles-Propreté/Net Brussel does not run any cooking oil container.
node/1626863446

Isn’t it an Oliobox instead?

Reminder: StreetComplete always shows the operator of those facilities; please apply extreme care when retagging them; in cases like this it is better to stop the quest and create a note instead.

156107533 over 1 year ago

Hello,
Thanks for the info.
If a shop closes down, please retag it as a vacant shop, so that the history gets preserved, do NOT destroy the node from the database.
I will try to recover this one.

156055813 over 1 year ago

Hello,

Thanks for some improvements here but here is a general recommendation: please do not repeat addresses on POI in Belgium; we work hard to have a clean address system with unique addresses either on buildings, or on address points. I will clean this up.

155933555 over 1 year ago

Please do not repeat addresses on restaurants or places. All the addresses in Brussels are already on the map, duplicate values are not useful and corrupt searches.

155897846 over 1 year ago

Pour info, en Belgique les codes postaux et noms des villes/communes sont calculés automatiquement par les zones de code postal et ville.

Merci de ne surtout pas ajouter ça manuellement sur les adresses, ça alourdit le travail de vérification et ça rend la carte vulnérable à la moindre erreur, qui pollue les recherches.
Nous allons nettoyer à nouveau.

155898336 over 1 year ago

Bonjour,
Le bâtiment est encore référencé sur la carte officielle UrbIS.
Dans ce cas, ne pas effacer. S'il n'existe plus, on indique des tags spéciaux pour qu'il ne soit plus visible.
Si vous ne faites pas ça, il sera réimporté à nouveau, c'est donc complètement inutile.
Nous avons corrigé, désormais il sera invisible et ne sera plus réimporté.