Reverted by changeset/124152700

Hello,

Would you please be so kind as to explain what you are attempting to change on the map here?

You merely named your latest 3 changeset "juist", "yes" and "juist".

I see you are removing lots of items, moving roads, and changing highway types. AFAIK, major changes like this should be discussed within the local community before processing. Some of the changes appear to be short-term road closures, which we normally do not include in OSM (or not like this).

Thanks in advance. You can write down here.

Fixed: changeset/124108804

Hello,

If you want to upgrade the tags on TEC bus routes, please do it in a separate changeset and with an appropriate title.

DON'T mix up such edits with other edits related to addresses on buildings, especially if your changeset description does not say what you are _really_ doing on the map.

Thanks in advance.

OK, thanks.

Hello JanFi,
Thanks for this work.
Just out of curiosity, what is the source of information for all those different areas? Personal survey? Importing data obtained from municipalities?
Thanks in advance.

I surveyed the area earlier today because I was intrigued why they would have two shops next to each other.

I regret telling you your edit was wrong: this is not the right building. I fixed it.

Hello,

Thanks for adding names.

Just one point: in OSM the first letter of most names is always an uppercase character ("The English House" instead of "the English House").

Happy mapping.

Hello,

May I suggest enhancing MapComplete by adding an extra tag with the survey date, when adding "operational_status=closed".

Hello,

Thanks for this and welcome to OSM.

It is important to write correct changeset titles explaining what you did. In this change, it looks like you removed a recycling container, and removed a fast food amenity and a cafe.

I suggest you would write something like "I removed X and X because they don’t exist anymore", or something like "update of shops on Rue de Bruxelles after a personal survey".

Thanks.

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Hello,

Thanks for this.

A tip to save time: in OSM the address on a building is only the street and the house number. You don’t have to endlessly repeat the postcode, the city, or the country on every house, because there are zones that do that already.

One more tip: as you can see, your change created a large bounding box because you also edited tags on TEC route 366. If you do this, it is always a good idea to also include this in the changeset title. ;-)

Happy mapping.

Hello,

Thanks for this and welcome to OSM.

I think some more information would be necessary to make the map correct. You could help me by answering those questions:

(1) Only this short part in front of 2 houses is one-way, or is it at least to Clos du Sureau/Vliergaarde?

(2) The one-way restriction you created will apply for every mode of transport by default. Cycle navigation will now exclude this street to enter Brussels. We should expect to have roadsigns that grant an exception for cyclists. What is the situation exactly, please?

Thanks and have a nice day.

Should be office=company instead of shop=*, indeed.

Hello,

Validators complain about streets having highway=pedestrian and no name.

For small areas or paths like this, noname=yes is appropriate.

All right. This was just for the sake of verifiability but, anyway, the value is probably correct and I will not bother you anymore with this.
Have a nice day.

Hello,

Thanks for this.
Is this document publicy available?

The Korean Cultural Centre is not the whole building, it seems.

There are other businesses here, such as Jones Day
https://www.jonesday.com/en/locations/europe/brussels
Picture of the building here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1277190952775488

Hello,

UrbIS says the building has both numbers 59 and 61.

Shall it be only 59? The current situation is wrong because there is 59 twice.

-- automatic translation by deepl below --

UrbIS dit que le bâtiment a 59 et 61.

Doit-il n'y avoir que 59 ? La situation actuelle est fausse car il y a deux fois 59.

Hi,
This area is triggering a warning about "amenity inside amenity".
If you know the exact span of the police station, you can draw it as an area (slightly smaller than the building, as long as the node for the Centre de jour/Dagcentrum is outside of it).
Otherwise, you can tag the police station as a node. That would solve the issue.
Thanks.

Good work, thanks.