Already on the map. And you didn’t even spell it properly. Your edit has been reverted.

Good to know the street has been rearranged. We have mapillary pictures from April and it wasn’t visible.

One thing: "chevrons" or "piste cyclable séparée"?

If you mean "chevrons" like in your changeset title, i.e. V-markings on the road, the value is "shared_lane" in OSM.

On this edit you added "track", which is used for physically segregated infrastructure for cyclists.

In a nutshell, here are the common values for the cycleway tag in OSM:
* nothing = "no"
* painted V-markings, bicycle logos or coloured lane (no legal value, colloquially named suggested cycle lanes) = "shared_lane"
* Dash marks (= =) (legal value) = "lane"
* Physically segregated track = "track". This one can optionally be drawn as a separate way, just like a road, though it is complicated to do it correctly.

Hope this helps.

Hello,

According to GRB there are two buildings here, numbers 428 and 426.

If you know the local situation and have a little time, it would be interesting to split it in two parts. (Buildings here seem to have drawn by hand and do not match government data.)

One more thing: if you want to add addresses to buildings or nodes, please only add the street name and the house number. Do NOT fill the postcode and city manually on objects, because existing zones automatically catch everything.

Hello,

AFAIK, EKD does not occupy 100% of this building.
The building is shared with other companies or associations.
The church should be tagged as a single POI within the building instead.

Hello,

If a shop is vacant, please remove its name and contact details and tag it as a vacant shop. That way, we can follow the history of an object across time.
Deleting a shop is a bad idea because we lose the history associated with it.

(I restored this one from backups.)

Bonjour,

Pour dessiner des bâtiments la source à utiliser est
SPW(allonie) PICC numerical imagery

Ne pas utiliser les _photos_ aériennes pour les bâtiments svp. car les formes ne sont pas correctes.

Dans l'editeur, bouton "Background Settings" pour trouver le bon fond de carte.

Hello,

Indeed, just a residential house.

Incidently, I removed the "name" because repeating the address is not a valid name for OSM.

Hello,

Thanks for this but just one thing: capacity is the number of bicycles that can be attached, not the number of devices.

Each U-stand can accomodate 2 bicycles, therefore 5 stands → capacity=10. 😉

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=760064075367867

Hello,

Thanks for caring about bicycle infrastructure but I think there might be a little issue with your edit.

Your changeset title is "Ajout SUL" but your edit does exactly the opposite.

AFAIK, there is a valid contraflow for cyclists here (SUL), and the "except bicycle" M2 signs are visible here on this recent picture:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=538028821256542

A "SUL" must be tagged like this in OSM: oneway=yes + oneway:bicycle=no (which routers understand as "one-way for everybody, then make an exception for cyclists for which it is _not_ one-way")

Your edit (v22) changed it into "oneway:bicycle=yes". As a consequence, cycle routers will no longer use it.

I am afraid I’ll have to undo your change. I felt I had to tell you.

node/9883201507 has invalid tags.

Make two separate nodes, one is a bicycle parking and the other is a charging station. "amenity_1" is an invalid key.

Hello,

Thanks for this.

amenity=charging_station is potentially for any vehicle.
You must add the vehicle type as an additional tag.

Do not forget to add "bicycle=yes" is this is only to charge bicycles, as the changeset title suggests.

amenity=charging%20station?uselang=en#Vehicles

All right, then.

WARNING: you broke cycle routing here.

Hello,

We had to re-do your edit because it was full of mistakes: you mistook the garage for the clinic itself, the tags were wrong, you used wrong separators, the opening hours were invalid… I feel sorry for your customer who paid you to get an online presence and who got such a poor service in return.

Just one more thing: spamming changeset titles with lengthy descriptions of what your customers are doing… is just pointless and won’t help your rankings because those changeset titles are not visible outside of OSM mappers. You might consider using your time more wisely.

Hello,

The building outline used to match UrbIS numerical imagery.

It looks like in your edit you redrew the building. The editor reports you were using "AIV Flanders" imagery to trace from it, which is not a valid source. We never trace buildings from aerial imagery. (And that being said, there are better sources for the Brussels-Capital Region; it looks like 2017 UrbIS imagery gives a better perspective, that is when the building was under construction.)

I am afraid we’ll have to revert your changes. But I’d like to hear your opinion first, and if you used another data source.

Thanks in advance.

Hello and welcome to OSM,

It might be a good idea to upload cached data in StreetComplete before travelling to another location.

Otherwise it will join all the changes in the same changeset and it appears to cover a large territory, despite being small changes on two remote locations. (This is annoying for any other mapper who’s keeping track of changes in one particular area.)

Another example here, it seems you travelled a lot yesterday:
changeset/124303502

Thanks in advance.

Hello,

Unless the place is walled and will never see a shop any longer, it is better to remove tags related to the shop and use tags like shop=vacant, instead of erasing the node from the database.

Thanks in advance.

Fixed in v5:
node/5060613914

Hello,

I think "construction=yes" is not recommended anymore, e.g. way/1033252151

Perhaps highway=construction + construction=footway if it is a new footway being built, or just access=no for temporary works.

What do you think?

Hello,

I think you created a hospital within a hospital here. That creates really weird stuff on the map now.

AZ Sint-Maarten was of course already on the map: way/222193048

This is not "Boulevard Anspach" here.
Your edit has been reverted.