Hello and sorry for the delay about this. I finally found some time to inspect the situation here.
I apologize if the wording of this changeset title may have sounded harsh. The main concern was about the outline of Marconi depot. Like all other buildings in Belgium, the reference data is the official outline provided by local governments, whereas aerial imagery has offset and shows a different distorsion on every yearly release.
The other changes here are okay and everything was restored, and sometimes refined even better.
Have a nice day.

Hello, and welcome to OSM.

Some tips for your next contributions:

1) Please write meaningful title when you upload data, e.g. "I added a pharmacy" instead of a vague statement that something was missing

2) Do not change building types. The building is not a giant pharmacy, it is a normal residential building with Multipharma on the ground floor. We redid your edit and mapped the pharmacy as a single node instead of merging it with the building itself.

Happy mapping.

Hello,

I checked and it looks fine now, thanks for your latest changes. I just fixed some permissions to make sure they produce the same access conditions as before even if they are tagged as paths.

Can you please check the coherence of route relations, they seem to have been broken

e.g. L26 here relation/57641 is currently discontinuous and contains parts of the alleged L26B/1, which should probably have its own relation.

Feel free to request help if you cannot do it yourself.

Hello,

Adding new shops is welcome but why do you change buildings into shops?

Example here:
way/701903137/history

Mixing buildings and shops is a very primitive way of mapping, we no longer map like this nowadays.

Instead of changing the building, it is better to add a floating node inside the building and put the shops tags on it.

Thanks for the explanations and for the pictures.

Indeed, this is a complicated case, combining an indoor footway (one part), covered footway (small outdoor part under the roof) and highway=pedestrian roads (some parts that are large enough to accomodate service vehicles).
I split several ways and moved the doors to the correct location. It should be better now.

SVP ne pas répéter l'adresse sur le magasin lui-même, les adresses sont déjà renseignées sur la carte (ici sur le bâtiment).

I merged both nodes. Basically, we re-use the existing node but the inscription tag you collected was added to it. I checked on aerial imagery and the white stone is clearly visible: the location from your survey is perfect, so I moved the old node to this location.

Small tasks like this can easily be done in any desktop editor like JOSM or iD. Don’t worry, it was really easy to fix.

Duplicate of node/6037623048

Hello,

The Brussels-Capital Region is a bilingual territory.

Names of roads or paths _must_ be written in both official languages on OSM. Adding only the French name to show on the map and relegating the Dutch name as a simple translation is considered vandalism. I admit you don’t have many contributions to the map so far and are probably not yet aware of this rule. Please bear this in mind for future contributions.

(We fixed the name.)

OK, I will not reopen the endless discussion about this wiki page (there are holy wars and some people edit the wiki to support some views).

If you set the permissions right, this already fixes most of the problems. "motor_vehicle=no" is always the default value for paths, there is no need to set that one.

Please stop creating double tags. Shops are mapped as floating points, do not duplicate existing information on the building, we don’t do this anymore in OSM.

I will repair your changes again.

Nous corrigeons les erreurs ici
node/12723416042

Prochaine fois : chargez les modifications séparément svp : un upload pour le bâtiment dans la province du Luxembourg et un upload pour les changements à Bruxelles.

Ne pas tout envoyer en bloc, car votre changement couvre 25 % du pays ici.
osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Désolé mais votre changement n'est pas correct.
L’institut Don Bosco est déjà repris sur la carte, en tant qu'école, avec le nom, contact, etc.
Il est inutile de répéter le nom de l’école sur les bâtiments.
Votre édition a été supprimée.

Hello,

Your latest edits to massively change footways into paths have an impact on access permissions.

By default, a footway is solely reserved for pedestrians. And highway=path is open to pedestrians, cyclists and horse riders alike.

I inspected the history of several objects which you changed; most were examined in the past year by a fellow mapper who is a specialist of this area and was working with the forest guards to map the various trails with the correct access permissions.

Your edits do not seem to source why you wanted to change the access conditions here, you only quoted a link to a wiki page.

Would you please be so kind and explain what you are trying to do here.

Thanks in advance.

## BAD CHANGESET ##
Your edit has been reverted.

## BAD CHANGESET ##
Your edit has been reverted.

Thanks for the information but please do not repeat full addresses on existing nodes.

We moved the office of BIPT/IBPT to its new builing and removed the address tags.

Reverted here: changeset/164330641