bxl-forever's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 138461018 | over 2 years ago | @Jakka: This is in reality a UX problem with Organic Maps. OM is a mobile app and when adding/editing a point it presents a list of blank fields with languages. Those will populate name:en, name:nl in OSM but not the "name" tag. The correct way to fill the "name" tag in OSM requires a fairly complicated procedure (0% chance a new user will think about this), i.e. hit the "Add a language" button and scroll all the way down to "Native for each country". The problem has been reported to the Organic Maps devs, this will avoid faulty edits like here. Also, the link of the hotel is bad, instead of linking to the brand it should link to the hotel itself, i.e.
|
| 138378535 | over 2 years ago | Hello, Welcome to OSM and thanks for adding more details here. Just one thing: It is not necessary to change the name of a statue into "Standbeeld Mercator". The object is already properly recognized as a statue. We don’t add descriptions in the name. I suggest you correct this. |
| 138304832 | over 2 years ago | Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM. Merci pour l'ajout. Nous avons corrigé pour indiquer les bons codes afin que ce soit correctement reconnu comme un cabinet de médecine générale. Vous pouvez si nécessaire compléter le point avec d'autres infos utiles, p.ex. téléphone, heures d'ouverture, etc. |
| 138302708 | over 2 years ago | Thanks for adding more stuff. "type=stand" is unknown and won’t be understood by most apps. The correct key is "bicycle_parking=stands". |
| 138303916 | over 2 years ago | Hello, amenity=bicycle_parking + covered=yes suggests this is just a normal set of stands under a roof. I saw from another edit of yours that you seem to use those tags for bicycle lockers, i.e. the typical dark-green box for bicycles in residential areas. Isn’t it one of them here? Could you please clarify? (You might be interested to type better changeset descriptions instead of the generic one offered by the app, because you have just spammed the changeset list today with about 20 identical titles.) |
| 138065118 | over 2 years ago | Hello,
|
| 138286038 | over 2 years ago | Hello, You added "note=peck 47" to this place. This tag is aimed at alerting other mappers about something peculiar. Would you please be so kind as to explain what we should do with this? Wasn’t is meant to be alt_name or anything? |
| 138260284 | over 2 years ago | Sorry but we had to re-do your change. Reminder for OSM:
Please read this advice, to make your future contributions better. Don’t bother anymore about this company, we fixed it.
|
| 138240313 | over 2 years ago | Pardon my curiosity but is this a test edit here? For instance, this area does not look like a forest to me.
Same for all the other forests you added here. Do you really think that every mapper who has been working on the map for the last 15 years has missed those important parts? Nice try but I am afraid we should consider undoing your changes. |
| 135472101 | over 2 years ago | Hallo, Éénrichting met *geen* uitzondering voor (brom-)fietsers? Zijn er M2- of M3-bordjes hier? In dat geval kan je "oneway:bicycle=no" en/of "oneway:mofa=no" toevoegen. |
| 138149161 | over 2 years ago | Hello, Despite it is common to say "cobblestones" in normal language, the OSM database makes a clear distinction between ordinary stones and small blocks used to build roads. "surface=cobblestone" is exclusively for raw stones laid on the ground, still found on ancient Roman roads, i.e. osm.wiki/File:Ancient_road_surface.jpg "surface=sett" is for those typical stones carved as small cubes: osm.wiki/File:Granite_Setts.jpg Real cobblestones are hardly found at all in Western countries. The "kasseien" everybody hates are coded as "surface=sett" in OSM. Would you please review your change and make sure that if you use "surface=cobblestone" only if you found one rare occurrence with raw stones. Happy mapping. |
| 138034599 | over 2 years ago | Hello, I see you have been quite active on the map today. Maybe some hints to make your future contributions better. 1) Make sure to write self-explaining changeset comments when uploading. An incomplete description or a cryptic text such as "small amendment to features" always sounds a bit suspicious. 2) Almost all addresses in Belgium are already on the map, sometimes on building outlines or as address nodes inside buildings or on doors. It is not necessary to repeat those addresses on every shop. I erased the duplicate address here.
Happy mapping. |
| 137978242 | over 2 years ago | This supermarket was already on the map here:
Please do not create duplicates, it unnecessarily corrupts the database. |
| 137926486 | over 2 years ago | Hello, Your edit has been reverted.
Too early, sorry. |
| 137548843 | over 2 years ago | Hello, We keep getting validation warnings with UrbIS data because of some pools you added. Why do you add an UrbIS reference number to swimming pools? AFAIK they don’t have any. Moreover, those id numbers are expected to be unique, whereas it looks like you are putting the same refs on distant objects, e.g.
|
| 137882392 | over 2 years ago | This conversation should rather go to the original changeset, i.e. changeset/137878661
In a nutshell: in OSM you can see the list of objects touched by a changeset below this comment, i.e. 1 way and 5 nodes were touched here. In a nutshell, this is a change aimed at fixing your latest edit, more precisely where the EU school and the university campus meet. They are contiguous area; I noticed you moved some points—and I think it was a good decision to rectify the "border" between them because it looked a bit weird before—and when you deleted some of those points you created gaps and/or overlaps between the two areas. This change is here to fix this. It was a minor geometry fix here. ;-) |
| 137878661 | over 2 years ago | Hello, and thanks for writing back. OK, that’s many points to discuss. First, I don’t blame you for the mistakes, everyone does mistakes especially on the first days, I am only here to make sure the map can stay a reliable source of information, because lots of people are relying on OSM to provide good data. And indeed, some university campuses may have changed and we are always happy to have more eyeballs to spot new changes there. About the discussion points here: 1) As I mentioned, building shapes are obtained by numerical imagery, those are special drawing layers provided by public authorities with the correct outline of every building. A fellow mapper routinely imports new buildings, so that you don’t have to do it. If you use the online editor it is possible to see this layer (UrbisAdm) but I would not recommend tracing on it directly in the online editor, it would take too much time. 2) Postcodes and city names are automatically obtained from existing areas. For instance, if you type "1050, belgium" in the search box on the main osm.org website you will obtain the area where every point automatically gets this postcode.
3) Here is an example.
4) I will agree that you had to intention to touch the VUB campus but as long as the OSM database is concerned, you touched it anyway.
Have a nice day. |
| 137878661 | over 2 years ago | Hello, Welcome to OSM. While we appreciate some details about building names or number of floors, your edit unfortunately contains several mistakes and it will take a lot of time to fix now. It might be useful to read the documentation and observe mapping practices before attempting to edit the map and potentially destroy things. 1) Building shapes are imported from numerical imagery. Please *never* redraw a building by following aerial imagery. Such imagery is not accurate and will never show the correct shape of buildings. If you do that, you damage the shape of a building. 2) Addresses are already on the map. Please do not add fancy details such as postcodes. If we do not repeat "1050 Ixelles - Elsene" on every building, it is not because we forgot to do that but merely because it’s not needed, given that we already have areas that say "all the points within this perimeter are in 1050, Ixelles/Elsene, Belgium… 3) In a bilingual territory, never remove a bilingual name to make it a monolingual name just because you prefer to see one language. This is considered as vandalism. Some people have been agressively doing that in the past and got banned from editing again. No politics on OSM please. 4) Beware that what you change on the map may have very bad consequences. You almost erased the VUB campus by mistake, while splitting a way. I’ve just restored it. Perhaps doing smaller edits for your first contributions will be better than attempting to deal with larger structures. Have a nice day. |
| 137784803 | over 2 years ago | This node is a duplicate of an existing school here: node/1949117231 |
| 137752752 | over 2 years ago | OK, thanks. I started updating the addresses to match your changes, to solve that problem. |