MxxCon's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 128538226 | about 3 years ago | Hello.
|
| 128537040 | about 3 years ago | Hello.
|
| 128534013 | about 3 years ago | Hello.
|
| 128461609 | about 3 years ago | Hello.
|
| 128461333 | about 3 years ago | Hello.
|
| 128455398 | about 3 years ago | Hello.
|
| 128267137 | about 3 years ago | Hello.
|
| 128257235 | about 3 years ago | Hello.
|
| 128192488 | about 3 years ago | Hello.
|
| 128183007 | about 3 years ago | Hello.
|
| 128142446 | about 3 years ago | fixed one thing but didn't notice so many other problems😳
|
| 128106830 | about 3 years ago | There's footway=crossing As for specific paint style, like zebra, etc there's crossing:markings=* |
| 128106830 | about 3 years ago | Hello.
|
| 128106680 | about 3 years ago | Hello.
|
| 128105971 | about 3 years ago | Hello.
|
| 128105447 | about 3 years ago | Hello.
|
| 128102833 | about 3 years ago | Hello.
|
| 128065997 | about 3 years ago | I think you are over-analyzing this tag. For me 1928 is acceptable value based on nycdob's database. I consider it to be accurate enough for these purposes. If you want to go by nytimes article 1929, that's fine too. "~1928" is fine too. |
| 128065997 | about 3 years ago | For this situation I think 1928 or 1929 are close enough and would be accurate enough to encode the intended meaning. |
| 128065997 | about 3 years ago | "~1928" is suitable as well. If you really want to find the exact date and relevant documents, you could try diging through DOBNOW website and see if they have those records digitized. |