The people rely on the government.

Depends on how you define ‘OK’. Indeed I find it OK that everyone has access to OSM, not just a small part of humanity. Might as well ban every country that allows non-renewable energy as it causes a climatic genocide (yep, that’s you and your country). The thing is, perhaps you should consider that not only many Hungarians or Israelis aren’t bigots, but also that nobody is a saint. Well, maybe except for the Jains.

I never commented on homophobia. Do you mean the part where I was against the exclusion of the majority of people? I have personally never witnessed homophobia on OSM and I’m sure it’s prohibited.

However you call it don’t consider me as one of the ‘bigots’ you try to exclude. I only wanted to explain to you why your idea is completely useless and does more harm than good. You have not countered any of my arguments, yet you had two opportunities already. First, you called homophobia bigotry yet i never said it wasn’t, then you accused me of excusing genocide, even though I didn’t even try to justify anything - I never stated that the actions of the Hungarian government are good or bad, I simply said that your intentions fulfill the definition of bigotry even more than the ones you accuse of it. What is the point of replying to my messages if you want to fight my genocide denial, a baseless accusation and a false part of my personality that you came up with?

Your intention to ban the Hungarian government and thus the Hungarian nation because it doesn’t pass certain laws you’d want it to is bigotry to a much greater extent. More exclusion won’t mean more inclusion.

If you look at any sort of data regarding LGBTQ+ acceptance you’ll see that anywhere but the western world the acceptance rate ranges between 0% and 10%. Perhaps you are the one who meets the definition of a bigot?

So… In your opinion, inclusiveness means excluding the views of about 90% of people?