I just removed it. Also removed a toilet amenity at River Run Playground I added before realizing the whole building was tagged as a bathroom.

I'm confused. Is the name ok though? Could I make that a loc_name? Will change or remove the description tomorrow.

ok. Will fix tomorrow.

Oh. Will fix tomorrow.

Its temporary. I'll remove it tomorrow.

Love the name!

I just used Q in iD after finding that ? meant to see all available shortcuts. Wow. Will be doing this regularly from now on. BTW. Occasionally, I'd get a message saying the corner could not be squared more. I assume no corner was square since many were eyeballed.

I wanted something to show I wasn't making it up. Would source:url be ok? For that pollinator place area I put the URL in a note because website was inappropriate.

Will look. Someone said use that or source. Unfortunately URL stuck in my head . And then I used mapcomplete. Thanks for catching that.

Thanks. Meant josm. I forgot what I did in id. Maybe a right click? I just remember a context menu. Q is better. Never used Osmcha.

Is that q in osmcha? I remember you saying that. Will use next time I use osmcha. I learned how to do it (and copy a feature) in the Id editor.

Its definitely cultivated. It used to be grass or grass was intended. Now its a bunch of plants that pollinators like. Hence the name. natural=scrub might be appropriate as there could be a shrub in there. landuse=grass would not be appropriate. Its fenced in. I have some recent photos.

Its possible that 5 years ago, the area north of the 101st Street Soccer field was filled with volleyball courts, but now its all marked for basketball courts. I would change that.

Ok.

I looked and couldn't find an official website or even a wiki page.

How about source:url as a tag for the newspaper article.

I went to change it and saw it was already changed so I have to assume you changed it and would've expected it to be at Version 2 but its at Version 1.

Isn't there a saying about denying history means repeating it. History is important.

corrected.

I read the link. I see why you said that. So is that text suitable to the Description tag as it is intended for end users assuming there are apps that use Description tags.