Yes this are the only groups tagged with the templates. Instead of let others add the groups, I would recommend that the group members add it by itself. They know best whats up :)

@Edward I don't know the exact 2.5D definition but the question is how flexible we want the concept to be :)

@chaos I asnwered you right at the wikis talk page.

You might use the OMS inspector to check out where adresses are already:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/

Great Dave, feel free to add it at
osm.wiki/Video_tutorials

Genau, diese werden auf www.openstreetmap.de dargestellt.
Es macht auf jedenfall immer viel Spass so ein Stammtisch :)

Genau, eine Vorlage findest du unter "Straßenbeschränkungen" übrigens :)

Moin, erstell doch mal testweise eine neue Nummer mit der Vorlage. Wenn diese auch nicht angezeigt wird, ist vielleicht dein JOSM Style defekt?

Hi, im Forum gibt es da einen sehr guten Beitrag zu:
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=9513

medical=aed gibt es 114
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/tags/medical=aed#wiki

emergency=aed gibt es 55 mal
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/tags/emergency=aed#wiki

Beides nicht wirklich repräsentativ, eine Karte gibt es auch nicht wirklich, also nimm einfach eins von beiden :)

Ja mit nem Briefkasten hat es bei mir damals auch angefangen :D

Nun es funktioniert :)

Also das einzige was mir dazu einfällt ist
osm.wiki/OpenStreetMap-in-a-Box
Aber ich glaube das trifft deinen Wunsch nicht wirklich. Ich glaube die Leute in Bonn wollten ne Live DVD mal machen

Nun wie dem auch sei, du meinst bestimmtt das hier:
osm.wiki/DE:Asking_users_to_accept_the_ODbL

Hi Sam,

well yes on a huge project like OSM there are always tensions but on different levels:

1.Mapping
That starts if a detail/object should be tagged in our DB and goes the long way how it should be tagged. (Please refer the tagging mailinglist). This comes with the different people working on OSM. There are the tech guys, that think on the technical consequences first and there is a group of users afraid that OSM gets to complex. Oh and a whole spectrum between this groups ;)

2.Organisation
There are always different oppinons on which course OSM should tage. For example should the osm.org map be for endusers or just fit the need of us mappers that are active in the project? Another example is the upcomming license change as said already was a big issue. There are also some problems on people working on the wiki and people that like just getting out and map.

But yes even esp. on this topic are hardliners we are very tollerant. So it's very important to us that you can get in contact with the mapper that might did something wrong.

But OSM is a "do-it-democracy" so to try a approach and showing the results to others is king. For example if you want to establish your proposed tagging scheme, the best thing is to make an killer map/app that uses your scheme so people like to show up their stuff.

You might refer to other accademic works focused on the social aspects on OSM:
osm.wiki/Research

Feel free to contact me for further informations, but keep in mind that I have only a limited view on the german chapter.

cheers,
Matthias

Ja dein Blog funktioniert und tickert weltweit :D

Hi Klokan,
cause I'm interested in the 3D usage of OSM (but not an active developer on this topic) I had contact with some of the related projects. Cause I see a good posibility to cooperate on central problems, I was asked to get all the projects together, to work on central problems. This might become more important due to the massive grow of buildings caused by Bing aerial photography:
osm.wiki/wiki/3D_Development

SPAM

Hi Henri, well wasn't it already there? http://open.mapquestapi.com/directions/releasenotes.html

Nein ich glaube nicht. Du kannst das aber gerne bei Mapnik mal vorschlagen bzw. bei Osmarender selbst einbauen:
osm.wiki/Map_Icons

SPAM

was auch gut ist, wenn man in note=* deine Informationen ganz kurz reinschreibt, damit auch andere sich nicht wundern