OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Email icon Bluesky Icon Facebook Icon LinkedIn Icon Mastodon Icon Telegram Icon X Icon

Discussion

Comment from Edward_Lowe on 9 February 2011 at 21:34

Would they be 2.5D models because there would be no volumetric measurement in these models or could a volumetric model be built in?

Comment from Chaos99 on 10 February 2011 at 09:38

[just posted this on the wiki discussion page]

Thumbs Up from me. I would really like to share my models I used to donate to Google.

I would prefer the 'external database' approach, as these models have nothing to do with the map data, neither technically nor logically. OSM is not a 3D representations of the world. It doesn't even include terrain height so far.

I would furthermore propose the collada file format for the 3D models, as it is an open, xml based format. It's machine- and human readable and would even allow osm specific extensions. (It would also allow easy sharing of models already created for google, as the sketchup-tool supports it.)

All we would need in the osm database is an anchor point. Mapping the local coordinate system of the model to the global system of the map would fall in the reign of the renderer.

Looking forward to this

Comment from !i! on 10 February 2011 at 09:50

@Edward I don't know the exact 2.5D definition but the question is how flexible we want the concept to be :)

@chaos I asnwered you right at the wikis talk page.

Log in to leave a comment