Proposal:Shop=clothes subtags
| Clothes and shoes extension | |
|---|---|
| Proposal status: | Abandoned (inactive) |
| Proposed by: | kocio |
| Tagging: | clothes:*, shoes:*=*
|
| Applies to: | |
| Definition: | Clothes and shoes subtags and removing not clear shop types |
| Statistics: |
|
| Draft started: | 2017-08-30 |
| RFC start: | 2017-08-30 |
Proposal
Creating several clothes:*=* and shoes:*=* subtags and marking shop=boutique, shop=fashion, clothes=* and shoes=* as deprecated.
Rationale
Clothes and shoes are very popular items sold and have many different properties, but currently it's hard to tag them precisely:
1. It's not clear how shop=clothes differs from shop=boutique and shop=fashion.
2. Both shop=clothes and shop=shoes lack more structured subtags extensions (clothes=* and shoes=* are too flat and mixing many useful properties).
Examples
Shop with clothes for small children, cotton only:
shop=clothes+clothes:for=babies+clothes:material=cotton
Shop with elegant hats, some of them are handmade:
shop=clothes+clothes:type=hats+clothes:style=elegant+handmade=yes
Shop with erotic underwear:
shop=clothes+clothes:type=underwear+clothes:use=erotic
Shop with military uniforms:
shop=clothes+clothes:type=uniforms+clothes:use=military
Shop with women's shoes:
Tagging
clothes:for=*(women, men, children, babies...)clothes:use=*(sports, wedding, workwear...)clothes:material=*(denim, fur, cotton...)clothes:type=*(underwear, lingerie, socks, suits...)clothes:style=*(casual, elegant, skate...)handmade=yes/no/only
and the same for shoes:*=*.
Applies to
Rendering
No change in standard rendering expected.
Features/Pages affected
shop=clothes- update and extendshop=shoes- update and extendshop=boutique- mark as deprecatedshop=fashion- mark as deprecatedclothes=*- mark as deprecated
External discussions
- https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2017-August/thread.html#33127
- https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1706
- https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/1719
Comments
Please comment on the discussion page.