Is way/688111233 intentionally missing tags for bicycle?

reverted - names are already present in the relation

changeset/171844199

reverted - names are already present in the relation

changeset/171844199

It's more subtle. One of them was bi-directional, and temporarily became one-way; the other was for
buses only, but was temporarily open to general traffic. Has this changed back?

what about these?
way/833133271
way/481610328

oops, thnx!

Hmmm... "If there is only one charge point at the site then it is usually not necessary to map man_made=charge_point separately. Just tag the socket information to amenity=charging_station.

This feature is optional. It is usually not necessary to map each charge point at charging station sites. Note that only amenity=charging_station will be rendered on maps and will show up in search results."
man%20made=charge%20point

mostly reverted with this edit: changeset/170833960
No need to invent some non-existent canals, to relocate some nodes or no create some unspecified crossings of roads and fences just to resolve some warnings!

partly reverted here: changeset/170833960
No need to relocate node to due some stupid validation warnings!

properly fixed in this edit: changeset/170833960

reverted with respect to relation/17854258 & relation/17854260 : structurally these are parts of a single building connected by a stylobate

changeset/170747031

Humph... I guess this requires some knowledge of how the cable cars work and what is needed to make them work again. But I lack it.
I would put more attention on whether the condition is marked with a separate tag (whichever) or with a prefix. With a separate tag disused=yes / abandoned=yes, the object will still be shown on most maps; while a prefix pretty much deletes it from most maps (the info will still be present in the OSM database, but pretty much useless).

reverted - everything was mapped precisely as it is, there's a gap in the pavement line and a part closer to the house

changeset/170685783

Yup, and this is described by sidewalk=no tagging. A (theoretical) router may be set to ignore roads with such tagging. But otherwise, people are free to walk on the rightmost lane of the road, keeping close to the side.

mostly reverted with changeset/170607815: the name is assigned to the main road, see https://maps.gov.ge/map/portal

reverted with changeset/170607815: the name is confirmed by https://maps.gov.ge/map/portal

rv - there is nothing in laws or signs to prohibit walking on this road

changeset/170607274

rv - name already present in relation/17405902

changeset/170406735

Hi! You can now officially use governmental imagery for editing. When using iD, just enter the following text into "Background Settings" > "Custom" near the right side of the screen:
https://nt0.napr.gov.ge/NGCache?x={https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:x}&y={y}&z={z}&l=ORTHO_GEORGIA_4

Among other things, you will see then that the previous geometry of the restaurant was more correct ;)

Вы добавили название к забору, а не к окружённому им саду.