Hello,

I see. No problem then!

Kind regards and happy mapping,
yasslay

Changeset in question: changeset/134955748

Hello,

I'm pretty sure that Manston Airport's runway, despite the imagery being deceiving, is not that wide. Additionally, Manston Airport is yet to reopen - something which is still uncertain as of right now. I'll be amending these additions in an upcoming changeset, which I'll link here.

Kind regards and happy mapping,
yasslay

Hello,

Thank you for the response. I understand, however it does not appear to be an industrial area, which is what you tagged it as. I've deleted the object in question, also keep in mind to upload your changesets within a small area. While this varies with the changeset preferences of different people, just keep this in mind in the future. Also, it is important that you do not do guesswork/armchair map on a large scale (osm.wiki/Armchair_mapping), as it can lead to QA problems such as the one seen with the object which I've deleted.

Nonetheless, welcome to OSM, and happy mapping!

Kind regards,
yasslay

Hello,

Can you explain why you added objects such as way/1155052369 in the middle of nowhere? Also, smaller changesets please: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Kind regards,
yasslay

Apologies, meant 'The Orchards'.

Salut!

S'il vous plaît éviter faire les grandes modifications à la carte comme ça va à l'encontre les règles sur le faire de modifications petites.

(osm.wiki/FR:Groupes_de_modifications)

Je suis désole si tu ne compremends pas ma message comme je suis anglais et ma française n'est pas très bien.

Cordialement,
yasslay

@luca sski

The untagged ways are a part of the relation which you sent, which renders everything inside the untagged ways as a wooded area. I'm not sure as to why Wulfmorn did not use separate ways and areas for this, though. Multiple untagged ways and a relation seem unnecessary for something which could be done in multiple areas.

A walk from Africa to Europe? Impressive.

Nonetheless:

- What's the source for residential areas like way/1144475742? It isn't very clear from aerial imagery.
- Why is the boundary box so big? Surely this could've been done through smaller changesets. It is good practice to add objects within a close distance of one another in one changeset and objects within a close distance of one another in another changeset (osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets). Also, this can fall under the definition of a mechanical changeset (osm.wiki/Automated_edits).

Please provide an explanation for the above. It'll be greatly appreciated.

Kind regards,
yasslay

Upon further investigation of some of the ways included in this changeset (in particular, the UK), I found that the warnings shown in the changeset box above were because of the user dragging roads together and just ruining the geometry of the ways. It’s hard to describe, but you can check my most recent changesets to get more of an idea of what happened. I hope this helps.

What has been done to way/337060413 is OBVIOUS vandalism. Reverting immediately.

It's alright, I'll add it it back in. No problem!

Hello!

Why did you delete the junction name area for the roundabout?

Kind regards,
yasslay

Smaller changesets, please!

Please make your changesets smaller, please...

I've reviewed the changeset and the quality of the buildings they've added are awful. None of them are properly mapped and they don't reflect their real world shape whatsoever. For example, this house in Wales (way/1130915290) and others like it are mapped awfully. This needs to be addressed immediately and other mechanical edits like it.

Apologies, the note was cut off for no apparent reason. For those wondering, I'm inviting whoever wishes to review this changeset to give their take on the name I've assigned the A2 here and whether or not it is suitable.

I see what you mean. I suppose at this point that the best thing for us to do is guess; and I think you made a good call here by changing the tagging of the road here. I agree with you on that it's the A28; it seems unlikely that this is otherwise, especially considering how the other roads link into this section road. Thanks a ton for doing this.

Kind regards and happy mapping,
yasslay

Thanks!

Hello!

I noticed that you changed an unnamed tertiary road to a primary road (tagged as trunk under OSM guidelines) as part of the A28. I'm pretty sure this part of the road here isn't considered to be part of the A28 when taking into account that a (stub of a) residential road from the current Saxon Fields development connects onto the road in question here.

I haven't surveyed the location recently, but I know there's some signage pointing to the road being the A28, but this is only coming off of the A2, and from what I can remember there's a non-primary road sign approaching the junction after turning off of the A2.

I won't touch the road for now until I come to a conclusion on what the road should be tagged as from the discussion here.

If you're wondering, this is the road I'm talking about:
way/154350709

Kind regards and happy mapping,
yasslay