yasslay's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 147493302 | over 1 year ago | Hi,
|
| 150536586 | over 1 year ago | Hi, Please don't erroneously tag land uses with highway=* tagging. I have reverted this change in the changeset linked below. |
| 150238051 | over 1 year ago | Thank you! I forgot to check the tags when copying and pasting. |
| 149438227 | over 1 year ago | Hi Nickinkent, Please be careful when modifying way geometry, particularly that of major transport links like railways. I have fixed the problem in the changeset linked below. Best regards,
|
| 148075216 | almost 2 years ago | Thank you. I stand by my assessment that this was a good edit and shouldn’t be reverted. The global spanning changeset is justifiable imo though it could be split up into smaller ones if it’s that big of an issue. |
| 148075216 | almost 2 years ago | Personally, I think that this mechanical edit was a good and bold one and should not be reverted. The reasoning jan-leila gave perfectly justifies the mechanical edit. However, some editors need to stop spamming changesets with "keep it local" without good cause to do so, i.e. mechanical edits that edit a couple of objects across different continents. That's to do with geographical size. This is to do with the mechanical edits of conduct. Thank you,
|
| 148002646 | almost 2 years ago | (Français)
Si la majorité de vos modifies sont en France, ensuite gardez-les en France s'il te plaît et faire les modifies en Angleterre dans un modification séparée. Voir osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets pour plus d'informations. Merci beaucoup,
(English)
if the majority of your changes are in France, then keep them in France please and do the changes in England in a separate changeset. See osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets for more information. Thanks a lot,
|
| 146200409 | almost 2 years ago | Hi Nathan, I understand and saw the source you added. I know that the A8(M) number applies to the spur in question. We have a similar situation with the A57(M) and A635(M) in Manchester where I tagged it as such a few months ago. I feel that the same should be applied here. Best wishes,
|
| 146200409 | almost 2 years ago | Hello Nathan, I know that this changeset was made a month ago, but the ref tagging is still incorrect and requires discussion. The "A8(M)" is signed as the M8 or (A8) on the ground so the ref=M8, destination:ref=A8 and highway_authority_ref=A8(M). The highway tagging should be highway=motorway_link in my opinion as the spur is minor and links to two major motorways. I'm not too concerned about this though. Any feedback would be appreciated. Best wishes,
|
| 146761160 | almost 2 years ago | + this seems permanent/indefinite |
| 144629567 | about 2 years ago | Hi, Personally, I didn't, however, I was interested in seeing the discussion that took place at Talk-GB or Talk-IE to see what was going on. That being said, discussions relevant to the mechanical edit should be included in the changeset tags per the Automated Edits code of conduct. I don't like to seek out or create drama, so I'm sorry if this has been particularly bothersome. Relevant documentation:
Best regards, |
| 144629567 | about 2 years ago | Hi, A discussion tag wasn't attached to the changeset, so it's reasonable to assume that this mechanical edit wasn't discussed. May I ask where you discussed the mechanical edit? Thank you! Regards, |
| 141749116 | over 2 years ago | Added in changeset/141773010! |
| 141749116 | over 2 years ago | Bus routing will need to be fixed later (unable to do this on GO! Map) |
| 140317282 | over 2 years ago | I’m going to be honest. These edits are complete and utter rubbish. Jubilee Way did not open in 2014. Although incompatible with OSM, historical Google Earth imagery show that the road has existed since the 1990s… 😐 This needs to stop now. |
| 138677237 | over 2 years ago | Thank you! |
| 137431541 | over 2 years ago | Hi! Why did you change way/78423988 to a secondary road with the number (A643)? Do you have a source for these changes? |
| 135712295 | over 2 years ago | This is my first attempt revert a changeset, so if there are any issues with this revert, please let me know! |
| 135712295 | over 2 years ago | Hello, Unfortunately, I regret to inform you that I have decided to report this and other edits to the DWG for further consideration as they do not appear to be constructive edits. If you wish to continue making edits, I recommend you to read this page on the OSM wiki: osm.wiki/Keep_the_history yasslay |
| 135712295 | over 2 years ago | Hello, Why on earth did you split the Pepperstock Roundabout into trillions of small ways?? You also changed one of the slip roads to a trunk link road when it should be a motorway link road. This edit will be partially reverted. |