yasslay's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 129286571 | about 3 years ago | You'e welcome! Don't worry too much about this, we all make mistakes at some point. Happy mapping, and merry Christmas! Kind regards,
|
| 129286571 | about 3 years ago | Hello. I have reverted part of the changeset in changeset/130267060#map=15/52.3753/-2.4266 where I removed the incorrect bridge tagging you added to part of Cleobury Road. I also looked at the streams the A4117 crosses, but there's no physical evidence of any bridges there. If you can provide a survey or piece of evidence which backs up the existence of a bridge along the route, I'll be happy to add it in for you. Kind regards,
|
| 130212595 | about 3 years ago | Forgot to mention it in the changeset description, but I also fixed the maxspeed:type=* tags and specified the surface type and smoothness of the road. |
| 124020874 | about 3 years ago | Hello! I left this as a note earlier, but I've decided to leave a comment here instead. Is the name 'Golden Valley Bypass' really the name of the A40 here? OS data suggests that this isn't the case and that the name isn't really what it has been tagged as in the changeset. I know that there's a suburb (node/5628763205#map=14/51.8971/-2.1360) named Golden Valley which the A40 does bypass, but it seems unlikely that this is case where the name has been applied elsewhere in the changeset. Kind regards,
|
| 129580686 | about 3 years ago | Hello! I noticed this and a few other changesets changing the tagging of busways (not guided busways) to highway=service and it being reverted to tags such as highway=secondary. I believe that the convention (from what I can understand) is to tag them as highway=service, access=no and bus=designated. If other types of vehicles, e.g. bicycles are permitted, then you would tag it as bicycle=yes. I hope this helps with clearing anything up. Kind regards,
|
| 125121953 | about 3 years ago | Hello! Why did you make this part of the Fosse Way one way? This isn't reflected on satellite imagery, please explain why you changed it to be like this. Kind regards,
|
| 128404913 | about 3 years ago | Also moved the retail landuse for the town centre to not go over the post office, as per the wiki guidelines. |
| 127886285 | about 3 years ago | @MxxCon, no sadly, I don’t really have the knowledge to do an automatic revert. If you can, it’d be great, however I think the DWG should also be made aware of this though. |
| 127886285 | about 3 years ago | I had a look at what the user changed, and it looks like he did even *more* fictitious edits and deleted lots of ways for seemingly no reason, some which have been edited within the past year or two, which should be a good indicator of their existence. I doubt that a changeset spanning the globe like this would be as informed as to their status... |
| 127812322 | about 3 years ago | I think that they just forgot to split the edits up into more local-sized areas, and Eflific please keep this in mind for the next time you edit as it is good mapping practice to keep your edits as small as possible. Kind regards,
|
| 124890248 | about 3 years ago | Alright, I'll go ahead and move the start/end point later. Kind regards,
|
| 124890248 | about 3 years ago | Hello! I noticed this edit from a few months later on, and you totally ignored the talk_gb list I had posted onto the changeset, which had reached the consensus of the motorway on OSM being mapped as starting at the point of convergence/divergence. I expect a response ASAP. Kind regards,
|
| 127591172 | about 3 years ago | Hello! Please make your changesets smaller, it makes it much harder to analyse areas of the map where this changeset spans. Kind regards,
|
| 127274609 | about 3 years ago | Hello! Please don't add overlapping features to OSM or features which are already mapped. This edit will be reverted. Kind regards,
|
| 127143065 | about 3 years ago | Hello! Please try to adhere to the good practice of keeping your changesets local in size (osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets) in the future, please! Kind regards,
|
| 127093389 | about 3 years ago | I apologise if a relation here was modified, it was an accident. |
| 127049927 | about 3 years ago | Hello! I understand now, I placed the village node in a more geographically centred area in the middle of the village as per the defining residential land use. I understand what I did wrong now and thank you! Kind regards,
|
| 127049927 | about 3 years ago | Hello! I’m a little confused, I didn’t change anything other than deleting the name from the residential land use in regards to Kings Hill and moved the village point to another location I thought was more suitable. If you could explain it more to me it’d be greatly appreciated since I couldn’t find much on the wiki. Kind regards,
|
| 126859282 | about 3 years ago | Hello! What exactly did you do here? I am a little confused since you didn't leave a changeset comment on this as part of good mapping practice. Kind regards,
|
| 126699382 | over 3 years ago | Hello! Why did you change this road to a trunk road and add a woodland with the name "woodland"? If you need any help please let me know. Kind regards,
|