wilda69's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 44423447 | over 6 years ago | Hello there,
|
| 65006194 | over 6 years ago | I have recently noticed that MPs are being treated differently. It used to be simple with Potlash, ie outer and inner, but now I read that these are not recognised with ID. I am at a loss which is correct. Mkgmap recognises the old way, but again with ID I cannot understand the logic of how MPs are being created. What you observe is not what I created but somehow is what ID is creating. There is an obvious conflict although the rendering is the same. |
| 68184392 | over 6 years ago | the machinery is parked just off the Route de Burange, so looks like they will start making an access from there first. |
| 68184392 | over 6 years ago | Moreno,
|
| 68723284 | over 6 years ago | Actually the MP tag was wrongly associated with these changes. It was ment for 9444754 as a number of polygons within this MP needed inner definitions since they were not showing correctly. A bit of work but worth it |
| 56227224 | almost 8 years ago | Hi Moreno, yes I was surprised also to find out! I suppose time will tell when construction will start. The Lenkeschlei school construction I plotted in Dudelange last year has no bulldozers doing anything there yet ;) |
| 54533836 | about 8 years ago | I suppose the virtual OSM tag is to compensate for those that sadly use polygons to plot lines ;) I am still horrified at the way Place Guillaume II and Place d'Armes have been tagged, causing steps to lead to nowhere and having a circular track you can't get to. I would say a problem of a lot of inconsiderate tagging ! |
| 54533836 | about 8 years ago | Actually it will, if you use the following code in your lines stylesheet: ("0x12" is a Garmin routable and needs to be defined transparent in your typfile; 1A can be defined whatever, in my case I have it as black dots) code: highway=virtual [0x12 road_class=1 road_speed=1 resolution 24 continue ]
Brgds
|
| 50630985 | over 8 years ago | Guillaume, I investigated the area today and replotted the old by-pass as it is now. The reason being that there is unrestricted access coming from the landfill. A lot of the by-pass has already had its concrete removed. The construction to the East looks like a massive underground water complex presumably linking up with the Gander. This will need to be revisited in three months or so.
|
| 50630985 | over 8 years ago | Hi Guillaume,
|
| 50689549 | over 8 years ago | You are correct. I saw that the notices say that the basin d'orage should be completed by "September 2016!" Maybe they should change it to 2018. The deviation for the PC2 is however clearly marked |
| 50666823 | over 8 years ago | Ofcourse ment NW corner ;) |
| 50666823 | over 8 years ago | Ive plotted it how it is now, and suspect wef September the NE corner will all be construction |
| 41926785 | over 9 years ago | Hi Guillaume,
|
| 37921628 | almost 10 years ago | Its a start ;) Noticed you had plotted the police station as "local knowledge" (do hope you kept to the speed limits), but they have moved to rue de Dudelange. Could not see who was now in that building,
|
| 35008086 | about 10 years ago | Many thanks for taking care of all the relations.
|
| 35008086 | about 10 years ago | dismantled is another tag that could be used. There is so much construction going on that very little is left. The point is that there are relations still attached to them which someone needs to update, so at the mom these nodes can not be deleted. |
| 35021571 | about 10 years ago | OK tks |
| 34935367 | about 10 years ago | Hi Guillaume,
1) there is a completely new temporary feed off the motorway to the Kirchberg P&R (which has been made smaller). At certain stages it has three lanes (for bus and turns) but have not bothered with these.
So, hopefully it will encourage others to tweek all those major changes.
|
| 34935367 | about 10 years ago | Hi Gerard,
|