wilda69's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 125152007 | about 3 years ago | Actually I was not in that area where you took the photo, so does that path way/263900755#map=19/49.45992/6.07659
|
| 126704335 | about 3 years ago | Good point; will correct these shortly. The Kayl one is still visible |
| 117413810 | over 3 years ago | Is this still current? |
| 125152007 | over 3 years ago | Thanks Moreno. Have a great w/e!
|
| 125152007 | over 3 years ago | I was there this afternoon and how completely different it now all looks!
|
| 124153979 | over 3 years ago | When was that tag approved as am still waiting for info |
| 124153979 | over 3 years ago | Yes it is |
| 11323651 | over 3 years ago | I presume you refer to the BEN POis; Thanks these have been updated; its been a while since I was last there |
| 123605892 | over 3 years ago | Indeed a huge area has been chopped and relandscaped. It appears to be part of the big Alzette project. There were so many MPs covering that area that I deleted the wood and rebuilt it. This may have caused the accidental deletion of the Schreiner's area. I have redone it as industrial but maybe you know what the correct tag should be..
|
| 120502447 | over 3 years ago | Hi M! I think the area is owned by the National Forest authorities as I saw them working there some years ago. It is now almost totally overgrown so not ideal for fruit vegetation hence my question. They have also chopped the strip of trees adjacent to the main road and the path is at places almost gone. In fact they kindly put it all the branches etc in one place, bang on the path near the service road.
|
| 99674235 | over 4 years ago | Thanks for that! Have deleted the empty relation. You have a great day as well! |
| 100367522 | almost 5 years ago | Thanks for the changes! |
| 100367522 | almost 5 years ago | Hi Guillaume. Good to hear from you again. Did not realise this info from geoportal disagrees with data.public.lu. As I dont see there is a way of accessing the latter without being a subscriber I will not be able to correct, so will have to wait for another import or have you change it back.
|
| 11468567 | almost 5 years ago | Thanks for pointing these out and have deleted the tags. Should not have happened ;) They were all unmapped until my walk there in 2012. |
| 11468567 | almost 5 years ago | Hello Donat. This is a long time ago. Can you specify the "offending" node. It looks like I used Merkaartor to simulate a Garmin French Topo plotting.
|
| 92637483 | about 5 years ago | Thanks for the info. It really just not make sense for them to call it N13B which means you can cycle upto where it becomes a motorway. On the official 1:20 000 R10 Luxembourg (Schengen-Weiler) map that stretch is clearly shown as a motorwaylink to the roundabout. I dont think we should change that for the sake of a inconsistent numbering. Maybe quote the ref is "N13B" |
| 92295576 | about 5 years ago | I dont understand your definition of members of a relation. Please advise as you say they are not the coordinates |
| 92295576 | about 5 years ago | If you refer to order by coordinates then I disagree, as often part a relation gets updated and looses its rank. In any case, a circular relation can have a starting point at any node unless that node is identified.
|
| 92295576 | about 5 years ago | So what is the command for establishing the start of a route relation in mkgmap without this tag? |
| 80375035 | over 5 years ago | Hi, colloquially speaking a chemist is also a pharmacy, and not just a person being a chemist. However, feel free to change this to avoid confusion |