OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
59957968 over 7 years ago

you should have malied me before the revert.

now it's your problem

walter

59826519 over 7 years ago

sorry, wrong link to list: https://wambachers-osm.website/images/osm/data/all_boundaries_tags.txt

59826519 over 7 years ago

fixed: changeset/59859665

59826519 over 7 years ago

btw: Goldstream and Yarmouth do have admin_level=8 but Skowkale does not.

Think they should be tagged all the same. But with or without al=8? you decide.

59826519 over 7 years ago

sorry, typing error. should be border_type=aboriginal_lands.

but why did i? there are about 33.400 admin boundaries with "border_type=X" and about 170 with boundary_type=X

see list: https://wambachers-osm.website/osm/data/all_boundaries_tags.txt

i would like to consolidate this tag - and after that add the info to the osm wiki. including used values of that tag.

walter

59503808 over 7 years ago

Hi, that can't be true: # 237508 Midland

see https://wambachers-osm.website/images/osm/snaps_2018/midland.png

regards
walter

59620903 over 7 years ago

Hi,
please do not change those very well ballenced disputed areas. This is the "OSM-view" of that critical area - so please don't change again.

59471578 over 7 years ago

Hi Fran - how should i know? ;)

regards
walter

59471578 over 7 years ago

Hi Frank,

thanks for your quick and polite answer.

yes, this area ist quite strange - espacially for people not living there.

i'll discuss this problem with some other guys (DWG). may be they know a solution.

JOSM is the best OSM-editor. There is nothing better. But the first weeks using Josm is a hard work.

regards
walter

btw: there were some errors in your last fix of that border. This has been fixed by "Garmin-User" on Suterday afternoon: changeset/59492238 The "before-upload-validator" of Josm would have informed you about that error (unclosed boundary polygon)

59473904 over 7 years ago

Ich könnte sie allerdings aus meiner lokalen History neu erzeugen - falls das notwendig sein sollte.

59473904 over 7 years ago

Hi Frederik,

möglicherweise war der Bot zu aktiv: die Landesgrenze AL2 von Nordkorea (id 192734) ist total weg und ich schaff es auch nicht, die zu restaurieren

Gruss
walter

59471578 over 7 years ago

Hi Frank, as result of your "work" you damaged the serbian boundary.
see: https://wambachers-osm.website/images/osm/snaps_2018/serbia_before_frank.png (before), https://wambachers-osm.website/images/osm/snaps_2018/serbia_frank.png (after)

at first: what is the source of your changes? Country boundaries (AL2) are very critical to change, especially when there are different "views" and there may be disputed areas (e.g. Kosovo, India/Pakistan and even Germany/Netherland).

next: you added your (Serbian) view of the international border but did not change the border of Croatia. This is technically wrong - one area can only belong to one country and not to two.

third: boundaries are forming a mesh. e.g the boundary of a city (al8) and the country boundary (al2) SHARE there common ways and they are connected.

see: https://wambachers-osm.website/images/osm/snaps_2018/serbia_frank_parallel.png

all this severe errors have to be fixed and therefore i reverted those changes.

the new added boundary way is still available. it is tagged boundary=disputed. you may use it AFTER discussion - including the croatian communiy!

BTW: Changing country borders as a newbie (6 day working and only 93 edits until now) is not good. You need to have more techical experience befory trying that. And using iD for doing boundary changes is not the best. iD is a "newbie editor" with much less validation than the prefered "professional" editor JOSM. Josm is doing the job much, much better.

regards
walter/germany

changeset: changeset/59483673

57093306 over 7 years ago

Hi Edbert (sorry für Evan),

ok, wenn da keine Absicht dahinter lag, ist alles ok. Hatte nur die Befürchtung, dass du entschiedener Gegner dieses Tags wärest - hätt ja sein können.

Zu den 3 Seiten mit postal_code_level: Stehen die im Wiki? Dann muss ich mir diese "komische" Begründung mal näher auschauen.
Gruss
walter

ps: bist du Fan der Wahlbezirke in Bonn? Ich wäre die gerne los.

57093306 over 7 years ago

Hi Evan,

magst du bitte postal_code_level=8 an den PLZ-Grenzen behalten? Die Level werden u.a. dafür verwendet um einfach zwischen PLZ-Gebieten und Zonen zu unterscheiden.

Abgesehen davon, dass das Entfernen "unpassender" oder unbekannter Tags bei OSM nicht gerne gesehen wird.

Danke und Gruss
walter

58501976 over 7 years ago

nun denn. ist ja schon erledigt.

58501976 over 7 years ago

Danke, dass du dich nicht drum gekümmert hast :)

walter

58001798 over 7 years ago

neither.

i only fixed the admin boundary of madinson by adding missing segments or splitting ways.

i usually don't merge ways or change tagging of those objects.

Regards
walter

btw: see https://www.openstreetmap.org#map=18/34.72849/-86.76380 - very strange parallel admin boundaries.

42065355 over 7 years ago

oder mach es einfach. ein Revert lässt sich auch reverten ;)

42065355 over 7 years ago

Hi Hermann

jo, die Sache ist echt knifflig. Ich bin mit einer Erklärung "einverstanden", kann aber nicht garantieren, dass jemand anders deine bald erfolgenden Korrekturen "in den falschen Hals bekommt"

Im Forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=62322 hatte ich die Lage von Potsdam ja schon angesprochen und wurde auf die - jetzt geltenden - Nutzungsbedingungen hingewiesen. Es wurde sogar von Revert gesprochen.

Nur hat den bisher niemand durchgeführt. (wie so oft: "man sollte ...) aber keiner machts.

evtl stellst du dein Statement da ein? Bin mir aber nicht sicher, ob das nicht ein Rohrkrepierer wird. Hast du von 2016 was schriftliches (Mail)?

Gruss
walter

58920501 over 7 years ago

Hi, changing admin boundaries is not an easy job.

You damaged a lot of boundaries yesterday in your area :(
see list https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/10-osm-reports/1227-countries-compare-2018-05-14 for entries of KOR and PKR (now fixed) and fixing changeset changeset/58946968

please try to do it better next time.

regards
walter, germany