une abeille's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 147222723 | almost 2 years ago | Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! If you're new to contributing, please make sure to read the wiki if you are unsure about anything. It contains a beginner's guide, as well as detailed information on all common map elements and standards.
In Montreal we use an offset of 0.6, -1.54 for the 2020 Bing imagery that is the default in iD editor. If you draw or realign elements, please change your offset to this value in iD by going into the Background Settings (shortcut: B key) and scrolling to the bottom to find Imagery Offset.
Thanks for contributing! |
| 147223348 | almost 2 years ago | Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! If you're new to contributing, please make sure to read the wiki if you are unsure about anything. It contains a beginner's guide, as well as detailed information on all common map elements and standards.
In Montreal we use an offset of 0.6, -1.54 for the 2020 Bing imagery that is the default in iD editor. If you draw or realign elements, please change your offset to this value in iD by going into the Background Settings (shortcut: B key) and scrolling to the bottom to find Imagery Offset.
In addition, please try to make your changeset comments descriptive. Other mappers should be able to tell what you changed based on your description.
Thanks for contributing! |
| 147222413 | almost 2 years ago | Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! If you're new to contributing, please make sure to read the wiki if you are unsure about anything. It contains a beginner's guide, as well as detailed information on all common map elements and standards.
In Montreal we use an offset of 0.6, -1.54 for the 2020 Bing imagery that is the default in iD editor. If you draw or realign elements, please change your offset to this value in iD by going into the Background Settings (shortcut: B key) and scrolling to the bottom to find Imagery Offset.
Thanks for contributing! |
| 147222684 | almost 2 years ago | Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! If you're new to contributing, please make sure to read the wiki if you are unsure about anything. It contains a beginner's guide, as well as detailed information on all common map elements and standards.
In Montreal we use an offset of 0.6, -1.54 for the 2020 Bing imagery that is the default in iD editor. If you draw or realign elements, please change your offset to this value in iD by going into the Background Settings (shortcut: B key) and scrolling to the bottom to find Imagery Offset.
Thanks for contributing! |
| 147222931 | almost 2 years ago | Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! If you're new to contributing, please make sure to read the wiki if you are unsure about anything. It contains a beginner's guide, as well as detailed information on all common map elements and standards.
In Montreal we use an offset of 0.6, -1.54 for the 2020 Bing imagery that is the default in iD editor. If you draw or realign elements, please change your offset to this value in iD by going into the Background Settings (shortcut: B key) and scrolling to the bottom to find Imagery Offset.
Thanks for contributing! |
| 147223837 | almost 2 years ago | Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! If you're new to contributing, please make sure to read the wiki if you are unsure about anything. It contains a beginner's guide, as well as detailed information on all common map elements and standards.
In Montreal we use an offset of 0.6, -1.54 for the 2020 Bing imagery that is the default in iD editor. If you draw or realign elements, please change your offset to this value in iD by going into the Background Settings (shortcut: B key) and scrolling to the bottom to find Imagery Offset.
In addition, please try to make your changeset comments descriptive. Other mappers should be able to tell what you changed based on your description.
Thanks for contributing! |
| 147223867 | almost 2 years ago | Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! If you're new to contributing, please make sure to read the wiki if you are unsure about anything. It contains a beginner's guide, as well as detailed information on all common map elements and standards.
In Montreal we use an offset of 0.6, -1.54 for the 2020 Bing imagery that is the default in iD editor. If you draw or realign elements, please change your offset to this value in iD by going into the Background Settings (shortcut: B key) and scrolling to the bottom to find Imagery Offset.
Thanks for contributing! |
| 146604452 | almost 2 years ago | Could you show me the error that it's creating? I don't want to interfere with routers, but I also think that keeping the nodes close to where the curbs are in reality is optimal. |
| 146604452 | almost 2 years ago | This changeset appears to make the curbs no longer align with aerial imagery. Are you using the correct offset of 0.6,-1.54 for Bing maps aerial imagery? I am generally very precise when I put in the curb nodes for sidewalks. |
| 145781095 | almost 2 years ago | Hi there, several of these buildings should be divided much more than they are. Rapid Editor is useful more for standalone houses than it is for series of plexes. If you'd like to use it, some of the areas up on the East end of the Island or in Laval might be good places to start, since they have many standalone buildings. In addition, please use the offset of 0.6,-1.54 for the Bing imagery in the region of Montreal, as specified on the wiki: osm.wiki/Montr%C3%A9al |
| 142767271 | about 2 years ago | I see you've asked for review on this. I changed the direction of 1re and 2e Avenue a few weeks back, what did you change in this changeset? |
| 140779653 | about 2 years ago | Good catch, thanks. I've fixed these. |
| 141558109 | about 2 years ago | The cycleway was not missing, it was tagged on the highway. I had verified it on site just a few days ago. Having it drawn in as a separate way makes it hard for people to know what kind of bike lane it is: currently the section that is just painted and the section that is actually divided from the road are represented the same way, which I feel is deceptive for people looking for the safest routes. This was also not drawn in with the correct offset, so it is misaligned. |
| 141486452 | over 2 years ago | Ah, I think I see why you weren't seeing any changes. Mapbox doesn't change in realtime — it takes about a week for me to see changes I've made on OSM to appear on Mapbox. I think the reason the REV is mapped as a way despite the infrastructure on the ground not being different is specifically about the fact that it's a named way. It would be difficult to name only the bike lanes if they were only tags on the main road way. |
| 141486452 | over 2 years ago | At least on the web map, I am able to see bike paths that are tagged: https://secure.bixi.com/map/ We should avoid "tagging for the renderer," which is discouraged. osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer |
| 141486452 | over 2 years ago | I think we ought to be moving the other way with these, honestly. It feels deceptive to be marking bike lanes as separate ways when they're not completely divided from the road — with the one exception that if they're part of a named network like the REV. I have been meaning to switch the southern part of 1e Avenue to tags instead of ways, but have been waiting for construction on it to finish so that we can see what the new layout is. |
| 141060777 | over 2 years ago | I have reverted this change. Your version did not even intersect with any roads and would not have been usable by routing software. Please review the errors before uploading changes to OSM. |
| 141060777 | over 2 years ago | Hi, I already added this cycle lane a few days ago. It is now duplicated. Can you please undo your changes? |
| 141061198 | over 2 years ago | Bonjour, la piste était déjà là. Je l'ai ajouté il y a quelques jours. Maintenant il y a deux pistes. Est-ce que vous pouvez annulez vos changes? |
| 140635159 | over 2 years ago | What do these points represent? Qu'est-ce que ces points représentent? |