OpenStreetMap
une abeille's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 149659397 | over 1 year ago | "Each parking area feature should be mapped as a contiguous area. [...] Individual parking rows should not be mapped as separate parking areas. To get that level of detail, individual parking spaces can be mapped separately with amenity=parking_space."
|
| 150013467 | over 1 year ago | If you put a note on each of them, I can try to confirm the ones in my area while I'm out. :) |
| 150013467 | over 1 year ago | By chance did this remove the ones that no longer exist? I've wondered in the past if there was any easy way to keep these updated, given that they move them so often. |
| 148308071 | almost 2 years ago | When you do these, perhaps please check that you are realigning the elements correctly if you move them. We use an offset of 0.6,-1.54 for Bing imagery here, and your edit misaligned this feature. I have fixed it |
| 147980757 | almost 2 years ago | It's the OpenSidewalks standard. If a short footway is not used to divide the curb node from the sidewalk centerline, then the router interprets the user as needing to navigate a curb in order to go around a corner, when this is not the case in reality. This doesn't impact routing for most users, but it is necessary for routing for users with mobility concerns. As for the naming, in my tests, short enough segments of footway are ignored in TTS routing instructions, so their lack of names hasn't presented a problem. Giving sidewalk segments names at all seems to be a divisive topic (since the sidewalk itself isn't inherently named "Rue Sherbrooke Est," for example, it's merely associated with the street of that name,) but having the names on the main segments has produced good routing directions in all my tests. |
| 147226882 | almost 2 years ago | Reverted cycle path |
| 147240344 | almost 2 years ago | I have reverted this change, based on updated imagery. |
| 147223348 | almost 2 years ago | This pond appears to be fictitious. Removed.
|
| 147304818 | almost 2 years ago | Welcome to the community, and thanks for contributing. :) |
| 147240344 | almost 2 years ago | Hi there, I believe you may have inadvertently changed this building back to its old shape. Bing imagery is from 2020, and this appears to be what you traced. Esri imagery is from May 2023 and shows a geometry much closer to what this building looked like before your edit. Could you please double check? |
| 147234473 | almost 2 years ago | If you switch to Esri imagery you can see the actual footprint of the building, if you'd like to refine this changeset to be as accurate as possible. The existing geometry represents the entire lot, not just the building. |
| 147222684 | almost 2 years ago | Yes, sorry, it was a copy-pasted message I was sending to all the new accounts from today, so that if they keep contributing they'll have the right information going forward. I wonder if the RTL stuff would be importable in any way now that everything is semi-merged under the ARTM? |
| 147226882 | almost 2 years ago | Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! If you're new to contributing, please make sure to read the wiki if you are unsure about anything. It contains a beginner's guide, as well as detailed information on all common map elements and standards.
In Montreal we use an offset of 0.6, -1.54 for the 2020 Bing imagery that is the default in iD editor. If you draw or realign elements, please change your offset to this value in iD by going into the Background Settings (shortcut: B key) and scrolling to the bottom to find Imagery Offset.
It appears that you have drawn a cycle path on a road that was already tagged as having one. (way/1160738173) It is difficult to tell from looking, but this way has tags that indicate the road has a dedicated cycle path. Renderers such as CyclOSM use this to display the cycle path. It's also good practice to keep your changes local to one area. If you'd like to edit things in multiple cities or countries, please save your work before moving on to the next one. :) Thanks for contributing! |
| 147222170 | almost 2 years ago | Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! If you're new to contributing, please make sure to read the wiki if you are unsure about anything. It contains a beginner's guide, as well as detailed information on all common map elements and standards.
In Montreal we use an offset of 0.6, -1.54 for the 2020 Bing imagery that is the default in iD editor. If you draw or realign elements, please change your offset to this value in iD by going into the Background Settings (shortcut: B key) and scrolling to the bottom to find Imagery Offset.
It looks like you have created a duplicate of an element that already exists. (Original: way/78567717, yours: way/1247689595.) If the park is indeed under construction, you should add this information to the tags of the original park, not as a description. Descriptions do not actually change things on the map in a way that can be used by renderers. Thanks for contributing! |
| 147222765 | almost 2 years ago |
Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! If you're new to contributing, please make sure to read the wiki if you are unsure about anything. It contains a beginner's guide, as well as detailed information on all common map elements and standards.
In Montreal we use an offset of 0.6, -1.54 for the 2020 Bing imagery that is the default in iD editor. If you draw or realign elements, please change your offset to this value in iD by going into the Background Settings (shortcut: B key) and scrolling to the bottom to find Imagery Offset.
In addition, please try to make your changeset comments descriptive. Other mappers should be able to tell what you changed based on your description.
Thanks for contributing! |
| 147224257 | almost 2 years ago | Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! If you're new to contributing, please make sure to read the wiki if you are unsure about anything. It contains a beginner's guide, as well as detailed information on all common map elements and standards.
In Montreal we use an offset of 0.6, -1.54 for the 2020 Bing imagery that is the default in iD editor. If you draw or realign elements, please change your offset to this value in iD by going into the Background Settings (shortcut: B key) and scrolling to the bottom to find Imagery Offset.
I see that you have added a park node here and requested review. Generally parks are drawn as areas, not nodes. But this appears to be a school grounds, so it should probably not be marked as a park. Thanks for contributing! |
| 147223144 | almost 2 years ago | Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! If you're new to contributing, please make sure to read the wiki if you are unsure about anything. It contains a beginner's guide, as well as detailed information on all common map elements and standards.
In Montreal we use an offset of 0.6, -1.54 for the 2020 Bing imagery that is the default in iD editor. If you draw or realign elements, please change your offset to this value in iD by going into the Background Settings (shortcut: B key) and scrolling to the bottom to find Imagery Offset.
Could you provide your source for the changes to this "playground?" It appears to be a skate park on aerial imagery, and it seems that it was correctly tagged already. Is the name official? Thanks for contributing! |
| 147223698 | almost 2 years ago | Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! If you're new to contributing, please make sure to read the wiki if you are unsure about anything. It contains a beginner's guide, as well as detailed information on all common map elements and standards.
In Montreal we use an offset of 0.6, -1.54 for the 2020 Bing imagery that is the default in iD editor. If you draw or realign elements, please change your offset to this value in iD by going into the Background Settings (shortcut: B key) and scrolling to the bottom to find Imagery Offset.
For shops that have closed, please tag them as vacant rather than writing a description. You may also wish to remove the shop name and contact information, as they are no longer relevant.
Thanks for contributing! |
| 147222512 | almost 2 years ago | Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! If you're new to contributing, please make sure to read the wiki if you are unsure about anything. It contains a beginner's guide, as well as detailed information on all common map elements and standards.
In Montreal we use an offset of 0.6, -1.54 for the 2020 Bing imagery that is the default in iD editor. If you draw or realign elements, please change your offset to this value in iD by going into the Background Settings (shortcut: B key) and scrolling to the bottom to find Imagery Offset.
For shops that have closed, please tag them as vacant rather than writing a description. You may also wish to remove the shop name and contact information, as they are no longer relevant.
Thanks for contributing! |
| 147222814 | almost 2 years ago | Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! If you're new to contributing, please make sure to read the wiki if you are unsure about anything. It contains a beginner's guide, as well as detailed information on all common map elements and standards.
In Montreal we use an offset of 0.6, -1.54 for the 2020 Bing imagery that is the default in iD editor. If you draw or realign elements, please change your offset to this value in iD by going into the Background Settings (shortcut: B key) and scrolling to the bottom to find Imagery Offset.
Thanks for contributing! |