saintam1's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 49788660 | over 8 years ago | Здравствуйте, Incendium, Я не понимаю, почему Вы разделили бул. Васил Левски на две. Он же есть один булвеард, не раделен как магистраль. Нет барьера посреди улицы. Есть двойная сплошная, но бсе такий там только одна улица. Более того Вы не изменили теги существующей линии, так что сейчас нарушенные автобусние линии, поворотные полосы, и тротуары. Мне кажется, лучше здесь использовать только одну линию. И легче будет. Как Вы думаете? |
| 50092495 | over 8 years ago | Привет, Стоян, Бих искал да поясня дали този магазин за велосипеди съществува. На уеб сайта им (http://www.bike-house.biz/) е посочен този адрес, както на фейсбук страницата им е предоставена тази снимка от месец май (https://www.facebook.com/BikeHouseBikes/photos/a.512555058828421.1073741835.477582338992360/1332557426828176/?type=3&theater), на която се вижда магазинът. Но не съм бил на място, заради това бих искал да го потвърдите. |
| 46993960 | over 8 years ago | No problem, just thought I'd flag it up. Thanks for your cleanup efforts. |
| 46993960 | over 8 years ago | Hello, you removed area=yea on a highway=pedestrian way (383174579), which made it appear as a loop when it's an open space. I'm guessing that wasn't intended? Cheers. |
| 49227923 | over 8 years ago | That makes sense. I think I'll start removing it from stops that I've surveyed. Thanks. |
| 49247510 | over 8 years ago | Hi Mike, The path is not suitable for the unsuspecting commuter, because it has regular deep grooves in it (for rain water channeling I think?), which is why I tagged it that way -- it's not for cycling unless you're into it as a sport. I think I'll just remove the tag. I don't know what the legal status of cycling here is. |
| 49227923 | over 8 years ago | Yeah, I've been wondering about that. I usually check the stop's name and location (and its existence), but I don't check any of the several other tags from the NaPTAN import. Does that still count as the stop being naptan:verified? I couldn't find a definition anywhere of what the criteria are for naptan:verified=yes. Is that what others do, just remove the tag once you've confirmed the stop exists? |
| 48918947 | over 8 years ago | Привет Squiffy, Забелязах, че сте променили категоризирането на административните граници. Това беше обсъждано във форума, но никога не се стигна до решение. Мисля, че ще е полезно, ако се включите в дискусията и ни информирате за нанесените промени: |
| 48528657 | over 8 years ago | Привет Incendium, (Можете на русском ответить) I think parallel ways should only be used when the two sides of the road are physically separated, e.g. like this: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:IMG_2238_-_Clara_Barton_Pkwy_at_NSWC_(looking_east).JPG There's been a lot of discussion of this and this seems to be the consensus: https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aopenstreetmap.org%20dual%20carriageway Also, please notice bus line relations: this changeset broke bus 102: relation/536928#map=18/42.67461/23.30594 Всего доброго! |
| 48732737 | over 8 years ago | Здравей/Ciao/Hello Andy, I see you have added a lot of information to the map of Sofia, that's great. I just want to point out that the tag "name" is not for the civic number of a house -- the addr:housenumber tag is used for that. Putting the value in the correct tag means that software consuming the data will be able to understand it. Also, entrance letters should be put on separate nodes with "entrance" and "ref" tags. Here are wiki pages about this:
If you have questions you're welcome to ask me, or on the forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=57 Happy mapping!
(можеш да отговориш на български ако искаш / Puoi rispondere in italiano se preferisci) |
| 48409382 | over 8 years ago | Cool! Thanks for clarifying. |
| 48409382 | over 8 years ago | Hello, what language has code "tok"? I don't see it on the reference page. http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php |
| 48345821 | over 8 years ago | Привет, Забелязах, че използвате Bing за очертаване на контурите на сградите. Но според GPS следи изображенията на Bing са с няколко метра неточни. Съветвам Ви да иползвате изображенията на Mapbox (натистнете "b" в прозореца за редактиране). Тези изображения са и по-нови. |
| 48063970 | over 8 years ago | Здравейте, Ако смятате да правите много промени по класификациите на улиците, моля първо да ги обсъдите на форума: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=57 Hello, If you would like to make lots of changes to road classifications, please discuss them on the forum first. |
| 47746842 | over 8 years ago | Hello, You removed the "area" tag on way/43365574, which is also a highway=pedestrian way. I think the area tag here is appropriate, to indicate that the inner courtyard is also a pedestrian area. I've put it back, do let me know if you think I was wrong to do so. Cheers
|
| 47627412 | over 8 years ago | Summary should've been "removed incorrect end_date tags". These bridges are still functional |
| 47425996 | over 8 years ago | Hello, I've changed the bus stop to a marina, (the exact tag, which maps.me apparently doesn't include in its list, is "leisure=marina"). Thanks for explaining. |
| 46585822 | almost 9 years ago | Hello, and thank you for adding a hostel to the map in Sofia. Do you happen to know what the hostel is called? Thanks |
| 46246859 | almost 9 years ago | Привет и благодаря за новите попълнения на картата. Препоръчително е да се използва кирилица за българските наименования. Аз оправих имената, които бяхте въвели. |
| 46051865 | almost 9 years ago | way/474410548 also seems to have wandered quite a bit as it now sits in Quartermile |