Ah interesting, thanks for checking. I've updated the road name

Hello,

Do you happen to remember where your addresses came from here?

The ones near 'Peterson' list Huntdale Rd, but are on Sams Branch. Huntdale Rd crosses the river at 'Huntdale'

Hello,
why did you 'change type' back on this way? Railroad does not exist here today

Why did you tag way/43783280 as a swamp? Doesn't look very swampy.

It barely exists anymore but thats besides the point

Please be careful about just clicking the buttons in iD editor. The entirety of Bent Creek Road is not a bridge.

why?

Hello,
If you are going to help out with TIGER review please make sure to actually remove the tiger:reviewed tag when you have completed updates. Otherwise it will have to be reviewed again...

This one can also probably be a driveway or track road instead of service. It leads to nothing

Can I ask why you added horse tagging to the Parkway? Disallowing horse traffic is generally not needed for traffic roads.

Hi,

Please stop connecting landUSE areas (residential) to landCOVER areas (woods). These are entirely separate features in the database. If you would like to map every single house as a residential area please do so in a way that actually reflects the landuse, not just filling in the areas not covered by woods.

Hi,
Please refrain from connecting landuse areas to roads, paths, and other features. These things exist independent of each other and should not use the same nodes in the database even if they are close to each other.

Please don'r remove the tiger:reviewed tags from ways that haven't actually been checked. The whole neighborhood on Bald Mtn has poor geometry, and a bunch of roads like way/16414861 are missing connections to other roads or are misclassified.

What made you retag relation/13612073 and relation/13612078 as landfills? They both look like MTR quarries on all the imagery I have.

If you're going to update old TIGER roads, please remove the TIGER reviewed tags; their purpose is to indicate which roads have not been updated (re way/18901119). And please don't create *new* roads with tiger:reviewed=no ... that kind of defeats the purpose of the tag (re way/1366655128).

I would 100% call what is here a tunnel but ok. I have merged the extra ways created.

Can I ask what you are sourcing these maxweight changes from? You don't list any source. I'm particularly curious about this bridge since it's part of active construction.

What imagery did you use to determine bridge was the 'correct' tagging?

What are the numbers in the trail names from? I've seen them on other sites but I can't figure out the source; are they a USFS designation?

I have reverted the NC edits in changeset #161756696 after finding no basis for them on the ground.

Well the point of the note was to *move* the tower, not *remove* it...

What is your source for these changes? I can't speak to the TN changes but all of the NC edits are incorrect.