qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 140886548 | over 2 years ago | Hi, could you comment what you've tried to achieve here, I don't understand what exactly mapillary shows here. |
| 140944012 | over 2 years ago | Hi, links are used where traffic is separately channelized like on highway ramps and so on, not in the middle of a junction, I'll revert your change. |
| 120301243 | over 2 years ago | Thanks to vandalism, I've noticed that
|
| 140632782 | over 2 years ago | You may want to cover the whole building with parts. Some consumers ( https://streets.gl/ ) care only about parts and they also don't support the idea of having a default fallback building's tags when parts are missing. osm.wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings
|
| 140021084 | over 2 years ago | I think it's better than nothing, but yes, asphalt is quite curshed there. I don't think that using values in Estonian would be correct though. |
| 139998496 | over 2 years ago | I've added dealership tags so that it won't be just a named building service=dealer
these are based on the website, correct me if I'm wrong. |
| 140047293 | over 2 years ago | Moved it a bit based on non-smoking circle around entrance visible on aerials |
| 140062973 | over 2 years ago | Hi, grassland is usually in the nature and not tended to.
|
| 139742391 | over 2 years ago | I don't know if it can be done in StreetComplete, but you can go to node/10943925534, click "Edit", select the crossing and on the left change Feature type from "Point" to "Marked crossing". |
| 139742391 | over 2 years ago | Hi, this seems like a recently reconstructed intersection, so I can't really judge from the imagery, but this crossing is probably not informal. Even if it's a crossing where pedestrians don't have a right of way, it's still probably a crossing=uncontrolled |
| 139585464 | over 2 years ago | Hi, kind of strange update, only one building is changed in Stockholm while there are other named buildings nearby. And the changeset is gigantic, from Sweden to India. |
| 139605535 | over 2 years ago | Hi, please don't put things which don't exist on a map. You are adding them for everyone, not just yourself. I'll revert the change. |
| 139533022 | over 2 years ago | building tags are not for ruins. roof kind of can be tagged, but as building=roof. Also, when you make a multipolygon, please check that the tags are on it and they aren't left on outer area. |
| 139495109 | over 2 years ago | Actually, area:highway=footway implies that they must be connected. Routers won't even try to use it. There is also highway=pedestrian which is a bit different, but as I've said, not all routers support it. |
| 139495109 | over 2 years ago | paths around this
|
| 139495109 | over 2 years ago | And lane parking should not be attached to the highway |
| 139495109 | over 2 years ago | Also parking on the road is not of "surface" type, see
or it can be mapped directly on the way
|
| 139495109 | over 2 years ago | Hi, I usually set bicycle=yes
if it's a usual zebra. |
| 139127645 | over 2 years ago | Hi, no one knows about this name, you shouldn't translate names or dig into their etymology, no one will understand it, locals don't use it. |
| 139201730 | over 2 years ago | Just delete closed shops. When there is some sign that a shop may be there even though it's closed, for example a signboard is left, add a lifecycle prefix Already added by mueschel
|