Hello JWNORRIS, thanks for your contribution. I know some of the edits at this golf course were made by another user, but I have a note for your future changes. The "name" tag should be used for primary names of features and for the most part should have a sign labeling them. In the case of golf features, to label a tee, fairway, or green as a member of a hole we more commonly uses the ref or description tag. For instance "ref=1" or "description=White 8 Tee"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115210486

Hello John, thanks for your contribution. Please check out this reference guide for the fairway-green intersection. The fairway should share nodes with the green and not overlap.
leisure=golf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls
I flagged way/1013909218 on osmcha if a visualization helps.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115185234

Hello DSanchez, thanks for your contribution. In the future, fairways with "cutouts" for bunkers, mounds, etc. should be mapped as multipolygons. Here are some references with examples.
osm.wiki/Multipolygon_Examples
osm.wiki/File:Golf.png
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114943737

Hi Andy, this is good work here. Just one mistake I caught, node/9342201833 was accidentally also tagged as a tee box in addition to the way/1012610779 it's a part of. I already made a quick fix. Please just make sure to check the validator before uploading.
changeset/115178833
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114982840

Hello Andy, thanks for your contribution. Please check out this reference guide for the fairway-green intersection. The fairway should share nodes with the green and not overlap.
leisure=golf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114982970

Hello AvidFan, thanks for your contribution. Please note that buildings like this should be orthogonalized. In iD editor, this can be easily done by pressing "q" to square the building when the way is selected.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115001736

This is a reversion of this changeset https://osmcha.org/changesets/115058543
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115143996

Reverted with changeset/115143996
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115058543

Hello Dave, was the residential area (way/972107003) demolished? It appears to exist in all aerial imagery I can access.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115111583

Hello Dave, what is the significance of the short cart paths near the tee boxes? For instance way/1013545505
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115134976

Hello Dave, thanks for your contribution. Please check out this reference guide for the fairway-green intersection. The fairway should share nodes with the green and not overlap.
leisure=golf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115141814

Hello Geoff, thanks for contributing! One request, please attempt to limit the size of changesets to a smaller region so that it can be more easily reviewed. Here is a reference link osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115175784

Forgot to add second source. Also used aerial imagery Oakland County MiSAIL 2020: BaseMap_EnterpriseOrthoTC2020BasemapMap

Hello John,
I understand this edit was made long ago, but do you recall why the lake in the NE of this changeset (relation/11521) was removed and replaced with a way that doubles back on itself (way/795459307)?
Also why the bridges in the south were removed (ways 719048332 and 719048336)? From what I can see in aerial imagery they still exist.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84027287

Thanks for the updates jpotas.
changeset/115068490
changeset/115068563

For further clarification, previous discussions on the OSM US slack have had consensus that even a temporary change is considered vandalism. Any temporary change you wish to make for personal download should be done offline and not pushed to the live OSM database. Please let me know if I can assist with offline edits when downloading for TGC-Designer-Tools.

For further clarification, specifically I am referring to way/688251137 (way/688251137) on the 13th hole. There is a guide on the wiki (osm.wiki/File:Golf.png) describing the proper usage of multipolygons for this type of feature.

Hello jpotas,
Does this golf course still exist at the time of editing? From what I can see in aerial imagery the land has been redeveloped as residential.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114452743

Hello jpotas,
Thank you for your contributions to OSM. My assumption for this changeset is that you are making this edit for use with the TGC-Designer-Tools utility for the PGA Tour 2K video games. If so, it is not accepted to intentionally map features that do not exist in the real world for this purpose. It is just like "mapping for the renderer", in this case the renderer is TGC-Designer-Tools utility. osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
Please refrain from deliberately moving nodes like this in the future.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114798481

Hello jpotas, a fairway with a "cutout" in the middle should be modeled as a multipolygon instead of having a single way approach very close to itself.
osm.wiki/Multipolygon_Examples
- Noah
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114930208