Hi,
could you check the destination tags you used here? There are two slight mistakes in the keys:
Different languages are tagged as ":lang:sv" - unlike name:sv. This is needed to prevent ambiguities with other subkeys like "destination:to"
- ":backward" is the last part of the key.

I.e. it should be:
destination:lang:sv:backward

In general, the order is:
destination
[:hgv|:bicycle|...]
[:ref|:lang:XX|...]
[:lanes]
[:forward|:backward]

(I don't say your choice of tags is wrong in any sense, I just think that we could keep it a bit more "compact" with fewer keys. "charge:txdot" seems necessary to have in your case as well as the charge:conditional for the axle counts)

It's not a recent addition to the Wiki - It was removed between May and August. It was there since 2017: osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Key:charge&oldid=1460075

There are also many occurrences of things like "6 EUR/adult; 3 EUR/child".
E.g. there are 21 "charge:motorcar", but about 500 "charge = xy/motorcar".

But another point: Regarding "charge:txdot:vehicle" - the order "charge:vehicle:txdot" would actually be more in-line with other tags - the transportation mode is typically inserted after the main key, and before the sub-key.

Hi,
I don't think it's necessary to have so many tags for the charges here - it's common to combine them into one tag, e.g.

charge = 1 USD/motorcar; 2 USD/hgv; ...

Could you consider changing this?

Could you check this building? It got a ref:bag and a bag:ref tag:
way/1013753770

'ref:bag' is the common tag.

hi,
could you check this intersection? it looks like one of the ways (turn left onto Jädersvägen) is missing. And there is a 'change:lane' tag instead of 'change:lanes':
way/971010493

Could you check this way, it got a strange 'msc' tag:
way/1013565615

Another question: What does "carrier_bike_parking" mean? This term is not used anywhere else.

Hi,
it looks like something went wrong here - these post boxes have many foreign tags that don't look like they should be in OSM. Could you check that?

Hi,
this way can be removed? way/1013928481

Hi,
'artifical' soll wohl 'artificial' heißen?
way/1012732598

Data like this should not be in OSM but needs to be in a separate database. There are hundreds of applications and thousands of maps, we can't have tags for all of in the main database.

Hi,
'opposite_track' is not yet used in any other place. I guess you're looking for either
traffic_sign:backward or
cycleway:left:traffic_sign

Are there some images available, then I might be able to help more.

In diesen Fällen sollte einfach die Zahlart erfasst werden. Die Auswahl ist soweit ich weiß nicht gesetzlich genau festgelegt.
Dazu noch authentication:none=yes , damit ist klar, dass keine Ladekarte gebraucht wird.

Hi,
you used a 'tonnage' tag here. This is not used in other places. Did you mean 'maxweight'?

Hi,
could you check the bicycle parkings you edited here? They got a "typ_stojan" tag - I guess you wanted to use bicycle_parking=*

Comparing outlines of buildings with images, it seems the old data was much more precise then this newly imported data. I suggest to revert this and about additional changesets.

Hi,
you used "admin_level:ps" here. Country codes are typically written with capital letters, i.e. it should be "admin_level:PS".
Could you change that?

Hi,
please check these changes - there are about 300 "addr:postalcode" instead of "addr:postcode".

Hi,
you added many ways with a "NPHidden" tag - could you check and fix this?

I don't think we have an established tag for this. There don't seem to be any cases of 'reverse' or 'reversing' with this meaning. But there are very few 'no_u_turn' tags which seem to be used in a case like yours:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/no_u_turn

I don't know how it's marked, but there are a few options to tag the physical signs as such:

divider
lane_markings
change
traffic_sign