Hi,
what does "rottms_distance" mean? This tag is not used in any other place.

Hallo,
du hast hier ~100 Mal den Key "platform_width" verwendet. Die übliche Schreibweise ist "platform:width". Könntest du das korrigieren?

It seems something went wrong here. I can't spot any of these features on any aerial image. In addition, there are about 3000 warnings and errors from the validator.

Hi,
wie kann man hier zahlen? "debit_charge" gibt es nicht.
node/9388665851

Hi,
could you check this relation, it got a strange 'Z' tag:
relation/13630565

Hi,
"destination:direction" is not a common tag. Destinations in different directions on the same sign can be tagged using destination:arrow. osm.wiki/Key%3Adestination%3Aarrow

Could you check / change that?

That sounds perfectly valid. Should I revert the changes I made here?

Hi,
it's good to see that tags are actually discussed and planned. Using the 'HR' country identifier is a good idea to reduce the mess of world-wide defined tags.

I can't read your discussion, but I guess you are aware that "operator:ref:HR:e-matica" is the reference number given by e-matica to the operator of the school, not a reference number of the school itself.

Hi,
there are 8 bus stops with "stop_*" keys which look like a mistake - could you check that?

E.g. node/476660315
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1eJF

Dann ist capacity kleiner als die Zahl der Sockel. Gar kein Problem.

9 einzelne Boxen heißt
capacity=9, damit ist dann klar, dass 9 Räder gleichzeitig laden können.

"socket" kennt nur eine Anzahl als möglichen Wert, aber nicht Freitext mit Zahlen und Buchstaben.

Hi,
could you check these trees? They got a strange "idemplacement" tag.

Hi,
could you check the tagging of these military areas? Some have a "millitary_service" tag instead of "military_service" ( "ll" instead of "l").

Hi,
it looks like something went wrong with a couple of objects, e.g.
way/1015655893
They only have foreign tags. Could you check that?

Oh sorry, I have to admit I didn't look into the history...
There seem to be more people involved, e.g.
kawtharfkih, formation1, matmati1978

Could you leave them a comment? That might help more than me writing in English...

Hi,
could you check this river? It seems something wrong with the name tag:
way/60243343

Hi,
it looks like something went wrong here - there are many ways with French tags like this one: way/284301220

Could you check this and correct the keys?

Thanks!

Yes, forward/backward, because it's related to the flow of traffic. cycleways and sidewalks use left/right because they are additional features on the side of the main road (in theory, at least).

Thanks for the picture!
These 3 tags should describe the sign:

motor_vehicle:forward:conditional = no @ (07:00-10:00, 16:00-19:00)
psv:forward:conditional = designated @ (07:00-10:00, 16:00-19:00)
bicycle:forward:conditional = designated @ (07:00-10:00, 16:00-19:00)

You could add things like
osm.wiki/Tag:lanes:bus:conditional=... or
busway:left = ...
but this doesn't contain any additional information. And actually it wouldn't be correct - there is no additional busway, the road is just closed for some kinds of traffic at certain times.

Hi,
the roads like this one got a number of strange tags.
way/38422548

Could you explain / show us the actual restrictions that apply here? Then we can figure out the correct tagging for it together.