OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
113158838 about 4 years ago

Lass aber besser noch einen Hinweis da, was "wip" heißen soll, sonst versteht es der nächste wieder nicht.

113158838 about 4 years ago

Meine "Prüf-Routine" ist mein Hirn, und das hat "wip" mit "wipe" in Verbindung gebracht, und zusammen mit deinem Kommentar "Umgestaltung Kreuzung" war die Änderung in "was" für mich logisch. "wip" gibt es nirgendwo sonst als Präfix.

Wenn der Radweg existiert, kann er doch ohne Prefix erfasst werden. Dazu kommt dann ein entsprechendes "fixme= Muss noch vervollständigt und komplett als separater Weg erfasst werden".

113040408 about 4 years ago

Hi,
you added a 'mater' tag to this fence - could you check that?
way/996904587

113027449 about 4 years ago

It looks like you added some tags to 3 ways that shouldn't appear in OSM, could you check that?

matching_distance = good
maxspeed:forward_detection = good
maxspeed:forward_matching = good
maxspeed:forward_schema = good
maxspeed:forward_status = valid

113045950 about 4 years ago

Hi,
I fixed several railway signal tags:
railway:signal:distant_repeated
should be
railway:signal:distant:repeated
Maybe an auto-completion mistake in your editor?

112936398 about 4 years ago

Hallo,
du hast über 100 Mal "ref:IPOT" verwendet anstelle von "ref:IFOPT". Schaust du da bitte mal drüber?

113079230 about 4 years ago

Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Please check the tags you added here for spelling mistakes - even the slightest mistake (e.g. bulding instead of building) makes the data not usable for any map.

113078970 about 4 years ago

The tag was added in this changeset: changeset/113012499

103134065 about 4 years ago

I wasn't aware of this definition of lgbtq=no - it also somehow contradicts the description in the first sentence which says "lqbtq friendly".
"prohibited" is not the same as "not lqbtq friendly".

I guess we need to either remove this tag or introduce a new value for this case.

112997985 about 4 years ago

Hi,
please check the nodes you added here - many got just a name tag, but no actual tag describing what they are.

112922853 about 4 years ago

Hi,
is "communication:2" a mistake or intentional?

112896990 about 4 years ago

Hi,
you added a couple of 'gene' tags here, could you check that? E.g.
node/9197050224

112893448 about 4 years ago

Hi,
"monitoring:particulate_matter_pm2.5" isn't used yet, but we do have
monitoring:PM10
monitoring:air_quality:PM10
Maybe you could change to one of these tags that are already used a few times?

112829396 about 4 years ago

Hi,
you used the tag 'holding_type' here - shouldn't that be holding_position:type?
aeroway=holding_position

112839086 about 4 years ago

Hi,
could you check these buildings, one got a strange tag:
nominatie = sloop

112987701 about 4 years ago

Hi,
this import created ways with foreign tags like these:
error:circular
source:datetime

Could you check and fix this?

112938409 about 4 years ago

Hi,
it looks like something went wrong here - you uploaded hundreds of nodes with foreign tags.

112949489 about 4 years ago

Hi,
all these trees got several tags that are not used by anybody else:
Altura maxima
Densidad de la copa
Diametro Tronco
Longevidad
name
name cientifcio

Please check the Wiki to find the proper keys for these values, e.g. species, species:es, height, circumference...

112791955 about 4 years ago

Please check this way, it has no valid tags:
way/995254736

112751464 about 4 years ago

Hi,
you added ~250 times the tag "gtfs:shape" - shouldn't that be "gtfs:shape_id"?