OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
112705532 about 4 years ago

Das sind hgv:trailer und hgv_articulated

112721196 about 4 years ago

Hi,
this way got a strange 'psr' tag, could you check that?
way/994100624

112746414 about 4 years ago

Hi,
could you check these edits? There are two areas like this one with only foreign tags:
way/994922833

112739449 about 4 years ago

Hi,
I found a couple of strange tags here like " Тоннар 4 = Молоко" - could you explain what they mean?

112739702 about 4 years ago

Hi,
could you check these streets you edited? Some of them got a strange "عمارت دهدشتی" tag.

112705532 about 4 years ago

Hallo,
was heißt denn "hgv:semi-trailer"? Ich nehme an du meinst "hgv_articulated"?

111966431 about 4 years ago

It's always bad to have two different tags that have exactly the same meaning. If you want to introduce a new scheme with a better name (which your tag definitely is), we should deprecate the old one and document the new one first.

112530157 about 4 years ago

This seems to be complicated to tag properly :-) I fear there won't be much support for this tag in the parking-related maps we have.

I would try to put the parking bay on a separate object (there is parking=street_side )
and have the restrictions outside the bays on parking:condition tags.

110106635 about 4 years ago

There is no claim at all, it is the documented tag *, described as "Expired drugs. Container available generally in pharmacies."
Drugs will never be recycled anywhere, so there can't be any confusing about what happens with them.

* Yes, I confused "drugs" and "medicines", so this should be fixed.

111966431 about 4 years ago

There are plenty tags in the recycling:* scheme that are not recycled, but either burned, put to landfill or re-used. Despite the name, the namespace is not limited to recycling, strictly.

Actually, the documented tag is "recycling:drugs", not "recycling:medicines", so my edit wasn't fully right.

A namespace "trash_accepted" is not used anywhere.

112694079 about 4 years ago

Hi,
I have two remarks about destination sign relations:

destination tags in different languages use the scheme "destination:lang:en", i.e. with an additional 'lang' in front of the language.

I also saw that you used some 'short:destination' and 'short_destination' tags, which are not used in other places yet.
There are a couple of uses of 'destination_full'. In these cases, 'destination' holds the name as written on the signs, and 'destination_full' holds the full name, as it should be read / pronounced by a navigation system.

112705579 about 4 years ago

Hi,
could you check this building, it got a strange tag:
node/3119913489

112729281 about 4 years ago

Hi,
it looks like you uploaded a raw GPS track as ways in OSM.
Could you check the Wiki to see how routes are added in OSM:
osm.wiki/Relation:route

112725709 about 4 years ago

Hi,
could you check this way, it got several foreign tags:
way/29860463

112666920 about 4 years ago

Hi,
the tag 'cutout' is not used in any other place - what is it you want to tag exactly?

112673148 about 4 years ago

Hi,
could you check this building? It got a strange 'vrac' tag:
way/85593663

112665542 about 4 years ago

Could you check this area? It got a strange tag:
way/523280448

112550701 about 4 years ago

Hi, you added a strange 'OSM_BUILDING' tag to 40 buildings. Could you check and fix this?

112597021 about 4 years ago

Hi,
you used the tag 'diet:non_halal' here - this is not used in other places. Did you want to tag that there is no halal food? That would be "diet:halal = no".

112626106 about 4 years ago

Hi,
you used many tags like "proposed_maxspeed" here. There's a slight spelling mistake: It should be "proposed:maxspeed". Could you check these roads and fix this?