Hi,
on these two schools I found several tags that are not used in other places or are misspelled. Could you check and fix that?
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please have a look to the OSM Wiki to find out which tags are in use.

Hi,
could you check this area, it got a strange "type_entite" tag:
way/993513012

Hi,
could you check this way? It has only foreign tags:
way/993457354

Hi,
welcome to OSM!
This building got a strange "Brgy." tag - could you explain what this means?

Ich weiß nicht, von welchen automatischen Edits du hier redest. Alles was ich getan habe ist, vor einiger Zeit ein Tag zu dokumentieren, das in Verwendung war. Erfunden habe ich nichts.

Heute ist dann ein neues Tag aufgetaucht, das ich von Hand in die bisherige Schreibweise geändert habe.

Abkürzungen werden übrigens auch in OSM-Tags in der Regel groß geschrieben.

OSM funktioniert nur dann gut, wenn alle die gleichen Tags verwenden. Und hier haben wir einen dokumentierten, weltweit genutzten Key, der über 140 Mal verwendet wird, im Gegensatz zu deinem hier erfundenen, den es bisher gar nicht gibt.
Wenn du ein neues Schema etablieren willst, dann schreibe bitte ein Proposal und benutze bis dahin den gängigen Key.

Es geht hier um Anschlüsse für mobile Elektronik, da macht ein Sub-Key zum allgemeinen "socket" durchaus Sinn.

Hi,
the key "parking:lane:lanes" is not used anywhere else - what does it mean?

Hallo,
die Tags 'ascent:forward' und 'ascent:backward' gibt es nicht.
Ich nehme an du meinst 'ascent' und 'descent'?

Bei dem verlinkten Weg habe ich mich wohl vertippy, ist korrigiert. Danke!

Ja, in den "einfachen" Fällen geben die zusätzlichen Tags keine zusätzlichen Informationen. Ich finde aber ein einheitliches Tagging doch ganz erstrebenswert.

Hi,
something went wrong with your last edits - there are many roads with two new tags which don't seem right:

error:circular
source:datetime

Could you check that?
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1c7f

Hi,
please check these edits - there are 11 objects with only foreign tags like this one:
way/992812146

Hi & welcome to OSM,
All these only contain foreign data, no valid OSM tags. Please read the OSM import guidelines - every import of foreign data has to follow these:
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

Could you check this node? It got two strange addr: tags:
node/7476019327

Hi,
could you check this building, it got a strange tag:
way/589846631

Hi,
here are another two rivers without name tags.

Essentially yes. 'old_name' is founde.g. by Nominatim and used for old names for objects that still exist. "was:name" is used seldomly and mainly in cases when the object itself got a 'was:' prefix.

I think that we don't need to have several name tags with the same value here, especially when one is very common and well supported.

Hi,
there are two ways here where something went wrong with the name tag, could you check this?

Hi,
please watch out for the correct spelling of keys. It's "landcover", not "lancover".

I don't know how this transliteration works. If it's some "straight rules" I opt for cr-Latn, i.e. the usual OSM tag according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_15924 .

If this is a special method of transliteration and there can be others that need to be distinguished, we could use a special tag like cr-SRO. Could you check your recent edits and switch to one common spelling, i.e. either capital or minor letters?

Hi
neither name:cr-SRO nor name:cr-sro is used in any other place up to now. What does 'sro' stand for? Is that the transliteration in Latin script?