Hi,
could you check these nodes? They all got a "capcaity" tag.

Hallo,
schau hier bitte mal nach dem Tagging.

"golf_tee" gibt es nicht, das sollte einfach "tee" heißen.

Der "name" sollte nur ein Eigenname sein, keine Beschreibung.
Die Nummer kommt nach "ref".
Die Entfernung in "dist".

Dann sind noch ein paar Tees mit einer seltsamen dreieckigen Form - das sollte nicht sein. Du kannst tee mit mehreren Farben versehen, z.B.
tee = yellow;blue

Hi,
could you check this way, it got an "OL" tag:
way/31411230

Mistakes happen...

Btw, you could also use the reverter plugin to revert this changeset, then you have these objects back and can move them to the right place.

Sorry if you didn't receive a notice - I added a changeset comment and you should have received an email:
changeset/102213295

There were parts of the ways crossing through buildings and crossing highways repeatedly and no hint of anything in the aerial images.

Level0 is an editor like any other one. There's nothing automatic there - changing a tag is even more manual work than in JOSM, because you can't edit several nodes at once.

If you want to use 'mobile_phone:technology', feel free to do so. But please keep the common 'communication:XYZ' tags in addition.

This is a monument, it has a 'start_date'. There is no ambiguity here.

If you want to make clear that it's the start_date of a monument, the proper tag is "start_date:monument".

Thanks for this polite remark.

Please check the wiki:
'opening_date' -> "An approximated date in the future when a construction will be finished"

'start_date' -> "the date the feature opened or construction of the feature finished"

Hi,
you added the new tag 'ref:CIS_JR' here. At the same time a tag 'ref:CIS_JŘ' appeared as well. Could you check that & maybe find a common spelling?

Hi, could you check your edits? There are several nodes straight from your GPX, e.g. this one:
node/8589185875

Hi,
what does 'signalization = illegal' mean? This tag is not used in other places.
There are mappers using 'wrong_sign' for incorrect traffic signs.

Hi,
could you check this node? I guess instead of 'cach_out' you meant 'cash_out'?
And, both cash_in and cash_out are 'no'. What service does this atm provide?

Hi,
welcome to OSM.
You added several nodes here with a 'punkt odbioru' tag. Could you clarify what that means?
Please have a look to the documented tags in the wiki and use only these - only well-defined tags can be understood by other mappers and can be shown on maps and in applications.

Hi,
the tag 'USFS' is not yet used in other places. Instead, many tracks use 'ref:usfs' instead of 'ref'. That should be sufficient to mark the track to belong to the USFS.

This was not an automated edit. I did not delete any information. I changed your tags to an established tagging scheme that is used thousands of times by hundreds of mappers.

If you want to introduce a new tagging scheme, please write a proposal.

I'm not doing any mass edits. Feel free to use this scheme if you like. As long as there is no accepted proposal, communication:lte=yes and communication:mobile_phone = lte are equally valid.

I only changed these 3 nodes because the tags there were yet another new, different scheme.

Unfortunately I'm not aware of a Wiki page yet...
I consult Taginfo in these cases:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=communication%3A

Hi,
mobile_phone:technology doesn't exist as a tag yet. Tagging this information as communication:XX is common and already used >1000 times.

There are several ways here with tags like
Los Pinos = yes

Please check.

Something went wrong with the name tag: way/347003302