OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
101906857 almost 5 years ago

Could you check this shelter, it got a weird tag: node/7837883012

101893545 almost 5 years ago

Please watch out for the auto-completion in the editor - I fixed several 'messsage' instead of 'message' keys.

98728443 almost 5 years ago

How did you check that the change from credit_cards to mastercard and visa is correct? Do all shops really accept these two and only these two credit card brands?

102213295 almost 5 years ago

Please check these edits - there are 8 ways without proper tags and in the wrong place, e.g.
way/925326514

101863161 almost 5 years ago

These suggestions are not used anywhere yet, but that's not really a problem here as your case is a rather special one. Just use a tag that blends in with what is already in use. If someone comes up with a better tag later, is easy to replace these - at least if it's clear what they mean and tagging is consistent.

If you feel there is need for tags to be used on a larger scale, then one should start with a discussion and documentation first.

101863161 almost 5 years ago

Thanks for the explanation!
I'd suggest to use a tag in the 'generator:output' namespace for this.
Maybe one of these is a good one:

generator:output:electricity:nominal
generator:output:electricity:maximum
generator:output:electricity:guaranteed

101863161 almost 5 years ago

Hi,
the tag "dependable_output" is not used in other places - what does it mean?

101903086 almost 5 years ago

Please explain these edits. It doesn't look like all these objects do actually exist.

101892313 almost 5 years ago

Hi,
you used the tag 'truk' here. This is not used in other places. Did you mean 'hgv'?

102043098 almost 5 years ago

Could you revert the other 13 changesets with 130000 objects as well?

101825272 almost 5 years ago

Hi,
could you check the service tags on this node? node/8566369819

Here's a list of common tags, maybe you can find something in this list:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/service%3Avehicle#similar

48502962 almost 5 years ago

Could you check this node? Is this a barrier?
node/4841750557

101869945 almost 5 years ago

If you want to have the elevation numbers in from and to, feel free to add them again. My main concern was to correct the keys.

101869945 almost 5 years ago

Ah yes.
The from/to tag is for the name of the start and end of the route. The elevation is not part of the name. I added the relevant information in the 'ascent' tag instead.

101869945 almost 5 years ago

Keys are case sensitive - "From" and "To" don't exist, it has to be "from" and "to".

101739852 almost 5 years ago

Hi,
'addr:uprn' has not been used anywhere else so far.
The common tag is 'ref:GB:uprn'.
ref:GB:uprn=*

Could you have a look and change this?

101734281 almost 5 years ago

Please check this relation - there's a wrong tag:
relation/12491704

101799250 almost 5 years ago

In addition: It's "place" not "places".

I also found cases where your "places" tag doesn't match the already existing value of the 'place' node. Please fix & correct these as well.

101668814 almost 5 years ago

Please check & fix the issues raised by the JOSM validator before uploading. There was a huge amount of unconnected or wrongly tagged highways here.

101799250 almost 5 years ago

Hi,
please check the tags on these objects. You added "name_ru" instead of "name:ru".