Right, transformers use 'rating', as opposed to generators and plants.

Thanks!

Hi,
what does 'pak=yes' mean? This tag is not used in other places.

Hi, this node got some numbers as tags, are these supposed to be in route_ref?
node/502414740

Please don't use the feature in iD to automatically add "missing" tags - this is broken since a long time and adds invalid tags like 'clothers': node/6249520504/history

Hi,
is 'red_turn:left' really right here? Didn't you mean red_turn:right?
node/7169675154

Hi,
you added the tag "red_turn:left:bicycle" - can bicycles really turn _left_ and not right?

Hallo,
diese Wege haben allesamt:

- keine gültigen Tags
- importierte GPX-Tags
- eine schlechte Lagegenauigkeit verglichen mit bestehenden Grenzen

Außerdem ist in der angegeben Quelle keine Lizenz angegeben, was für eine Verwendung in OSM aber notwendig wäre.
Die Daten sollten daher wieder gelöscht werden.

Hi,
the lanes tags you used here don't exist - instead of left/right it should be forward/backward.
e.g. instead of
lanes:right:bus -> lanes:bus:backward

Could you check that?

Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Please don't add private information like names of home owners and numbers of occupants to OSM. OSM is purely a geographical database and should not contain sensitive private information.

Could you check this way, it got a strange tag:
way/508954901

Dieses Proposal habe ich noch nie gesehen - die Syntax ist auch nicht kompatibel zu Lane-Tagging (das | hat eine spezielle Bedeutung).

"red_turn:right" ist dokumentiert, seit Jahren in Benutzung und existiert 1500 Mal. Das spricht eindeutig für dieses Tag. Ich würde vermeiden, die Datenbank mit Tags zu füllen, die vor 5 Jahren erfunden wurden, über die allerdings noch nicht einmal eine Diskussion geführt wurde.

'railway:signal:combind:shunting' gibt es bisher nicht - soll es 'railway:signal:main:combined_shunting' heißen?

Could you check this way, it got some strange tags:
way/918518119

Hi,
please check the tags - what does 'service:bicycle:pai' mean?

Was heißt denn dieses Tag?
traffic_signals:turn:bicycle:forward = all|right_on_red

Das übliche Tag wäre wohl
red_turn:right:bicycle = yes

Hi,
would you mind checking these recycling tags? There are 11 that are not used in any other place.

Thanks for the list,
please let me answer with a list of questions for clarification:

-"electric vehicles"- that's any car or truck with electric motor? Does it include bicycles with motor (speed pedelecs) or electric kick-scooters?

- things like postal service, emergency vehicles or urban hygienic service are usually not tagged, as these are allowed on any road like these if it's necessary for their work. This should rather be tagged only if they are *not* allowed somewhere or are the designated users.

- are there vehicles without a motor that are not allowed? Think kick-scooters, inline skates...

- what about delivery vehicles of any size?

This approach will not work - there are too many distinct sets of users and use cases.

With this approach, each application has to be able to understand each of your (new and undocumented) tags to get the routing right - that's why you shouldn't use access=no at all.
These tags will make routing on these streets almost impossible - especially because it seems that every stretch of road has another set of special tags.

As I wrote above - please describe what the actual rules are and I'm happy to help writing a set of access tags to translate that to OSM.

Please check the nodes you edited in this town - there are ~ 100 with strange tags like

ogr_pkid=2687C20F667F01860EA9950CC658FD3B_Address_4357
tipo=R

Hi,
please check the buildings you added recently, there is a spelling mistake in the keys:

building:materials -> building:material