Das traffic_sign Tag kannst du gerne drin lassen, der Wert sollte aber ein anderer sein, am besten die Nummer der Verkehrszeichen.
Wahrscheinlich steht da etwas wie dieses hier, aber ich kenne das Schild nicht.
traffic_sign = DE:267,DE:1022-10

Hallo,
diese Tags gibt es sonst nirgends:
traffic_sign = entrance_prohibited
valid = Motorfahrzeuge
Bitte schaue im Wiki nach den korrekten Bezeichnungen.

Das Verbot der Einfahrt wird in OSM mittels einer Relation eingetragen, siehe
osm.wiki/DE:Relation:restriction

Thanks for the explanation.
This should be fee=no in this case - if they start to charge a fee, the tag can be changed.

How do you authenticate yourself at the charger? A card? An app?
For this we have 'authentication:XY', see
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/authentication#similar
osm.wiki/Key%3Aauthentication

If these are just internal links, it's useless to add them to the global OSM database. Plenty of applications try to show these images and will throw an error if they can't access it.

motor_vehicle plus bicycle ergibt "vehicle".
Bei "access" sind natürlich noch Fußgänger, Pferde etc. dabei. Kommt auf die Situation vor Ort an.

motor_vehicle und bicycle getrennt getagged ist aber auch in Ordnung.

Please check this restaurant, it got a strange 'diet:re' tag:
way/864971051

Hi,
all the fuel tags you added here are not used in any other place:
fuel:95E10
fuel:98E5
fuel:cng_gas
fuel:diesel_B

What was wrong with the tags already present?

And, additionally, your aerial images are outdated. Many of the areas don't exist any more on more recent images.

Hi,
all these areas overlap with existing natural=wood areas.
Please don't add new areas on top, but change the tagging of the existing objects.

And, all the tags are misspelled, it is 'landcover' and 'source'.

Please check and fix this.

Please check the tags you used here:

- is:in_village should be is_in:village

- All the image links you added do not work

Hallo,
was heißt denn das Tag "bike"? Das gibt es in OSM nicht.

Hi,
could you explain this?
charge = 0
fee = yes
There is a fee, but it is 0?

Please don't use the OSM database
- for hotel price information
- for extensive advertisment in the 'description' tag

Please use common tags instead of custom ones, e.g. these should be replaced:
guest_capacity
service_provided
class
parking_capacity
parking_info

Hallo,
alle paar Tage wird bei irgendeiner Bus-Relation das 'from' Tag durch ein '+' ersetzt, zuletzt hier:
relation/3556244

Ich weiß nicht wie das passiert - vielleicht kannst du mal darauf achten?

I don't think maxspeed and capacity tags are the right way to add old, outdated inscriptions to the database.

By the way, the sign doesn't limit the number of horses galloping across the bridge! It's just forbidden to lead/drive them over the bridge.

I don't think maxspeed and capacity tags are the right way to add old, outdated inscriptions to the database.

By the way, the sign doesn't limit the number of horses galloping across the bridge! It's just forbidden to lead/drive them over the bridge.

Please check this node, it just has a misspelled tag:
node/8043821100

Hi,
you added two objects with a large number of foreign tags - could you check that?
node/8049003628
way/864013294

Hi,
please check your edits for the tags you used. These tags are not documented:
Postoffice
Type
district

You have to use tags that are documented in the Wiki or available as presets in your editor to make sure that all other mappers and apps are able to understand them.

Hi,
this is a discrepancy between the Wiki and the actual tag usage.
Taginfo lists 2002 cases of 'naptan:LocalityName' and 0 for naptan:locality_name.
The last major changes on this Wiki page are from 2009, so I wouldn't expect it to show the current tag usage.
I don't know who the current experts for the naptan scheme are, but I think changing the Wiki is perfectly fine looking at the tag statistics.