mueschel's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 152307179 | over 1 year ago | Hi,
|
| 152306577 | over 1 year ago | Hi,
|
| 152208019 | over 1 year ago | Hi,
charge= 1 EUR/bicycle_tube; 2 EUR/brake_pad |
| 151869560 | over 1 year ago | So, the building is fine, but can't be used because the entrance road isn't usable? I.e. if this is will be blocked for a longer time access=no on the building and the road should be fine for the moment. |
| 152101994 | over 1 year ago | Hi,
|
| 152072953 | over 1 year ago | Nothing new to suggest or define here, that's an established use case, even supported by common presets in JOSM. See e.g.
|
| 152072953 | over 1 year ago | I can only repeat what I wrote several times: Please don't invent new tags without documentation and discussion. This just makes the data inaccessible for anyone else who is not a human manually reading the tags on an object. |
| 152095010 | over 1 year ago | Hi,
|
| 152072953 | over 1 year ago | I think 'traffic_sign' is totally correct here. In most legislatures "traffic signs" are not only the metal plates on poles, but any type of road marking are defined in the same part of law and also named traffic signs. I'd suggest to use 'traffic_sign' and in addition some kind of 'location' tag specifying its position and type, e.g. 'on_street'. In this particular case this is not even necessary, because HK:604 already is the code of a sign that always is painted and not on a physical sign. I strongly recommend not to use road_marking:id. First of all, this resembles the syntax for tags in Indonesian language and second it seems to be based on 'traffic_sign:id' which was recently proposed and heavily downvoted. |
| 152034072 | over 1 year ago | Hi,
Deswegen auch die Änderung - ansonsten bin ich aber auch eher der Meinung das Präfixe zu verzichten. |
| 135402166 | over 1 year ago | Hallo,
|
| 151954993 | over 1 year ago | Hi,
|
| 151869560 | over 1 year ago | Hi,
|
| 151872730 | over 1 year ago | Hi,
|
| 151883877 | over 1 year ago | Hallo,
|
| 151870137 | over 1 year ago | Something went wrong here, all these objects don't have any valid tag. The changeset is also missing the mandatory documentation of any import, see
|
| 78873639 | over 1 year ago | Hi,
|
| 151780410 | over 1 year ago | Hi,
|
| 151712101 | over 1 year ago | Hi,
|
| 151668824 | over 1 year ago | Hallo,
|