Hi,
there are some hundred ELVIS, REVERSED and RIVERSPLIT tags that made it through your import routine.

Hi,
I'm pretty sure I checked and saw that the address itself was already mapped. But maybe I misread one of the other ones. It was not my intention to delete valid house numbers.

Hi,
you added 'mmsi' and 'mmsii' tags here. These are not yet used in other places.
However, there are many "seamark:radio_station:mmsi". Would it be possible to use this tag?

Hi,
could you check the parking on this way? Is it street_side or lane?
way/7369454

I removed those tags.

You are free to tag whatever you want, but don't expect any tag to be understood by fellow mappers and to be shown in any application unless it is documented and approved.

If you want to propose to change the tag and / or do a mechanical edit to change the 75,000 occurrences of twitter tags please feel free to do so. Until this is approved, we should stay with the established and documented tag.

I reverted this changeset. You mapped the shadows of clouds on Bing images.

Hi,
these ways got a large amount of tags that look like they shouldn't be in OSM. Could you check that? This import is also missing the source of the data.

Hi,
I just fixed several "maxwidth_physical" tags. The common spelling is with a colon:
"maxwidth:physical".

Hi,
it seems you're doing a large scale import of shop nodes?

There are several tags that need to be edited:

- 'description' with a long advertisement text - the description tag is not meant for that, it should be used to describe the specific POIs only.

- 'contact_facebook' is not used anywhere up to now. The correct tag is 'contact:facebook'.

- the 'operator' tag contains quotation marks which should not be there.

- your changesets miss information about the documentation and the sources of the import.

Please read the OSM import guidelines:
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

Hi,
you used the tag 'tiktok' here. This is not used in other places. Could you change this to the common 'contact:tiktok' tag?

Hi,
could you check the recycling tags you added here? In OSM only the tags that are described in the Wiki should be used - and they should be in British English and not in French.

The table of recycling tags can be found here:
amenity=recycling#Accepted_types_of_waste

It's a common scheme to add :1 to a key if the value doesn't fit into one tag.
Usually this is done only if the value is too long.
For wikimedia_commons the more often used semicolon to separate two values doesn't work - file names are allowed to contain semicolons.

Hi,
you used tags like "railway:signal:speed_limit_distant:id" here. Shouldn't that be 'ref' instead of 'id' to match the common 'ref' tag?

Hallo,
du hast hier bei einigen parking-Tags "vehicle:electric" verwendet.

Wir haben zwar noch kein akzptiertes Proposal für die Bezeichnung von E-Fahrzeugen, was aber schon häufiger verwendet wird ist electric_vehicle und electric_car.
Ich würde vorschlagen, das entsprechend zu ändern.

Hi,
railway:track_side is a new tag - what does it mean?

Hi,
it's a long time since, but this road got a strange 'maxweight_1' tag. Could you check that?

Hi,
it's a long time, but you used some ride sharing tags here that are not used in other places. Could you check if the documented car_pooling tags fit?
amenity=car_pooling

Do you know if these POI still exist? At least the website doesn't...

Hallo,
ein Aufzug ist es trotzdem. Dass er nicht öffentlich genutzt werden kann ergibt sich aus access=private.

Ein Privatparkplatz wird ja auch nicht als private:amenity=parking erfasst.