Hi,
Could you check this way? It has many strange tags:
way/451081268#map=19/42.69136/-71.06352

Hi,
I recently saw these tags from you:
destination:distance:ref:to
destination:to:distance:forward

Up to now we don't have an established syntax for distances given in destination tags. But, with respect to the ":to" you added, I think the correct tag (and order) is
destination:distance:to:ref
This is the same order as e.g. in destination:symbol:to

Cheers, Jan

If you have trouble doing the revert, let us know. There are "experienced reverters" who know how to solve common problems.

Hi,
I saw you put the tag "zip code" on many objects. This tag is not used in any other place. The common tag for this purpose is "addr:postcode". Would you mind changing your edits so that OSM can make use of your work?

Cheers, Jan

Da steht, du sollst es vermeiden und mit access ergänzen. Flächen auf denen gefahren aber nicht geparkt wird (z.B. am Frischezentrum dienen die meisten Flächen der Zufahrt und als Platz zum Rangieren für LKW) sind sicherlich nicht amenity=parking sondern highway=service.

Überdeckte Parkplätze sind ein Problem des Renderers, nicht der Daten.

Löschen von vielen Objekten, ohne auf andere Probleme zu achten (schau dir die ganzen unverbundenen Wegstücke an!) ist jedenfalls nicht der übliche Umgang mit Daten in OSM. Ich werde deinen Changeset jetzt reverten und die vielen Fehler korrigieren.
Diskutiere das meinetwegen im Forum aus, das Löschen von Objekten aufgrund irgendeiner ohne Konsens geschlossenen Note ist das, was du so gerne "Vandalismus" nennst.

Bitte? Lies das nochmal.

Und weiter? Dort wurde vorgeschlagen, access=* zu ergänzen. Deiner Meinung mit dem "wild im Kreis rumfahren" hat keiner zugestimmt.

Warum hast du hier Unmengen an Objekten gelöscht?

Hi,
could you explain the keys 'foot:color' and 'foot:shape'? They have not been in use before. Maybe there is a better suited way of tagging.
Cheers, Jan

This seems to affect at least 10300 objects, possibly more.

Hi,
on 50 of your ways I found the tag 'sarface', which is misspelled and should be 'surface'. Could you have a look and correct this mistake?

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
could you check this node? It has the key 'name:marie' with a wikidata ID
node/3137504611
Cheers, Jan

Hi,
I see that you already made some changes.

I'd go for "office=legal" - this tag is used few times already.

Languages spoken can be tagged as follows:
language:en = yes
language:es = yes

And, because it has not been said before: Welcome to OSM! Feel free to contact me if you need help.

Hi,
thanks for the reply. Many users add information to OSM just to be visible in search engines, and your edit looked like one of those.

You don't have to delete this information, but it should be changed to standard tagging, e.g. opening_hours has a well defined syntax that can be understood by many applications ( opening_hours=* ).
I'll have a look on the other tags later today.

Jan

Hi,
could you check the tagging of ways like this one: way/450091182

All keys in OSM have to be in English and use common values - otherwise they are of no use because no software can understand them.

Cheers, Jan

Hi,
I found some nodes with the tag 'manmade' - the correct spelling is 'man_made'. I just fixed that for you.
Cheers, Jan

Hi, could you check this node?
node/2793193647
This tag looks a bit strange:
Prima H4=stele

Cheers, Jan

I'm not the original creator of these nodes, just fixed some mistakes.
If you come to a conclusion regarding these uploads, please let me know.

Laut wiki ist das Umspannen eine primäre Funktion einer substation. Z.B. substation=minor_distribution von ~30kV auf ~300V
power=substation
"This kind of substation directly supplies households and small businesses with low voltage power (e.g. 400V/230V in Europe). It is fed from the medium voltage distribution grid normally having a voltage between 3 kV and 30 kV. "

Transformer hingegen ist das Gerät an sich.

Hallo,
du hast hier einige Objekte getagged mit
power=substation
power_1=transformer
Keys mit einem '_1' sind normalerweise ungünstig, weil sie nicht ausgewertet werden. Laut Wiki ist an diesen Gebäuden das substation Tag richtig, und transformer würde an einem Objekt im Inneren der substation liegen.

Gruß, Jan