OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
94307382 about 5 years ago

Please let me remind you about the comment I posted a week ago - you have to use the correct way to enter hiking relations. The current data is useless.

changeset/94075253

94158570 about 5 years ago

I just wanted to change species:name to species:en.

What happened here was a copy and paste error.
It's the string I removed from another POI in the changeset right before. Must have clicked the middle mouse button by mistake..
Sorry & thanks for fixing it!

94092066 about 5 years ago

Hi,
please check the tagging of this way. The 'dirt' and 'private road' tags don't exist anywhere else.
way/871513765

I guess you look for 'operator' and 'surface'.

94028907 about 5 years ago

Hi,
please explain what the tag means:
staticBikeParkAndRide=yes

This is not used in any other place.

94121006 about 5 years ago

Hallo,
bitte achte auf die Schreibweise von Keys. All diese Tags haben Fehler:

post_box: color
post_box: position
post_box:color
post_Box:color
post_box:position

Keine Leerzeichen, 'colour', 'location'

94097277 about 5 years ago

Hi,
please stop importing data from unknown sources. All the nodes don't have any valid tag and many nonsensical ones like
unnamed=0
unnamed_2=0
unnamed_3=0
unnamed_4=0
unnamed_5=0

It's necessary that you follow the OSM Import Guidelines.
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

93954953 about 5 years ago

Please check this node, it got a strange 'ad' tag:
node/8109735184

93858558 about 5 years ago

Hi,
please check this way, it got these two tags:
maxaxeload = 6
maxaxleload = 10
way/199959437

93874099 about 5 years ago

Hi,
please check these edits.
Many of landuse=farmland overlap with residential areas, woods and buildings.

94075253 about 5 years ago

Hi,
welcome to OSM.
Please spend a bit of time to understand how relations work in OSM. The best is to look at existing hiking trails.

A relation is always a set of already existing ways - adding additional ways without tags, overlapping with roads and paths, is not the right approach.

I'm afraid we have to revert all the changes you did so far.

93984872 about 5 years ago

Hi,
you added the tag 'ref:RF:CRTA' 50 times. Shouldn't that be 'ref:FR:CRTA'?

93710019 about 5 years ago

Hi,
could you check this node, it got a strange 'debit' tag:
node/8091015394

93953226 about 5 years ago

Hi,
could you check tags here?

'flow' is not really common, 'flow_rate' is used and documented more often.

There are several spelling mistakes 'mechnical_driver'.
Btw, is there nothing like pump:power or similar for this feature?

93902984 about 5 years ago

Hi,
please explain these edits. The tags you used are not used in any other place, e.g.
E=69.7952
N=36.6244
Proposed_Structures=Proposed earthen canal remodeling, L= 61m

What is the source of this data?

93748447 about 5 years ago

Hi,
'recycling:aggregate' is not used in any other place. Is there no matching common tag documented in the Wiki?

93760722 about 5 years ago

Hi,
you used two tags here that are not used in any other place. Please explain what they mean:

santa-fe-chamber-of-commerce = santa-fe-community-profile
santa-fe-community-profile = 2020-addendum

93713450 about 5 years ago

Could you check this node, it got a strange 'vcr' tag:
node/8091206867

93918791 about 5 years ago

Please explain this import of data. It doesn't follow any of our Import Guidelines.

- none of the objects has any common tag
- no source link is given
- no documentation and discussion on the Wiki

Please revert these edits and follow the import guidelines:
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

93878762 about 5 years ago

Please excuse me, I put the comment on the wrong changeset.

93844150 about 5 years ago

This import of data went wrong.
All the ways only have foreign tags, there is no source given, the link to the necessary documentation is missing.
You didn't add a changeset comment.

Please fix these issues.