Hi,
where did you find this information? AFAIK the original naming was correct.

Hi,
could you explain which socket type this refers to? "socket:DCfast" - this is not used on any other chargers.

Hi,
could you explain the different "cat4" for toll charges you added here? It would be very helpful if we could express that using the default vehicle categories and conditional tags.

hi,
you uploaded 5 areas like this one, but they don't have any common tag. What do they represent?
Could you check which documented tags can be added?

I'm completely fine with the :lang:sr and :lang:sr-Latn tags.

But the term "designation" has a completely different meaning in OSM
osm.wiki/Key%3Adesignation

Hi,
could you check this way? It got some strange 'designation' tags that look like 'destination'.

Hi,
you used the new tag "maxspeed:conditional:normal = 120 @ (19:00-06:00)" here.
You could use the conditional to add the date in the normal conditional tag:

maxspeed:conditional = 120 @ (19:00-06:00, 2024 Jan 01 - 2024 Aug 31 off)

Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Could you check the wiki how archaeological sites are typically tagged in OSM?
historic=archaeological_site

It's important to use tags that are documented in the Wiki to allow other users and software to understand their meaning.

Hi,
could you explain the meaning of the strange "BU_travée" tag?

There are also many nodes that have a "indoor=wall" tag that should be on ways only.

Hallo,
was meinst du am Brunnen mit dem Tag "trog=yes"?

Hallo,
du hast hier viele Tags neu angelegt um Fahrplände detailliert zu erfassen.
Kennst du die vergangengen Diskussionen ob solche Daten in OSM erfasst werden sollten? z.B. gab es schon ein Proposal in dem sich die Mehrheit gegen solche Daten ausgesprochen hat:
osm.wiki/Proposal:Public_transport_schedules/Departures

Außerdem verwendest du "service_times" und "servive_times" (sic!), wo das übliche Tag "opening_hours" ist.

Hi,
there are still 30 ways with these tags, do you still plan to fix them?

Hi,
the reason why I noticed the tagging: colour:pole and colour:support are not in use, but pole:colour and support:colour are.

But there is also a logical reason why it makes sense. The main feature is a sign. It has several colors, so subkeys are used. colour:text, colour:back as you mentioned.

The support and pole are additional features which are not strictly part of the sign itself, so all tags concerning them are grouped in a namespace with all tags starting with pole:* or support:*.

We do the same in many other cases, e.g. highways: The highway gets a "surface" tag, and the sidewalk gets a "sidewalk:surface" tag.

See changeset/145996139

Hi,
you're using many tags like "description_9:uk" that are not used in other places.
In case it's necessary to split a description in several tags the usual syntax is "description:9" with a colon. Could you change that?

Btw, wouldn't it be better to add a link to an external source instead of adding huge amounts of text to OSM?

Hi,
you added many ways here, but none of them has any proper tag like "highway=path". Please have a look and fix these objects.

Hi,
you added the tag "Post ID" here. This is not used in other places. Could you explain what it means?

Hi,
you used many recycling tags here that are not used in any other place.
Could you check the wiki for common tags and change them accordingly?
amenity=recycling

way/1267094278

You added the source tag "Google Street View" here. Please be aware that Google images are not available under a license compatible with OSM.
Please revert all edits you did based on their images.

Hi,
could you explain the meaning of these nodes?
There is no border mapped near these nodes, and some of them are in the middle of fields, not remotely close to any road, e.g.
node/11741154389