Hi,
there are many ways with an ELVIS or REVERSED tag - could you check that?

Hi,
the tag "maxweight_singlevehicle" is not used in other places, and it seems to contradict the 'maxweight'. Do you have an image of the actual sign?

Hi,
you used tags like "parking:charge:conditional" on these 'amenity=parking' objects.

The 'parking:' prefix is only used on parking lanes on highways and is not needed on these areas. The common tag is simply "charge:conditional".

Could you have a look and change that?

Hallo,
"railway:hand" sieht mir nach einem Tippfehler aus, kannst du das checken?

Hi,
you added a strange 'xxx_tmp' tag here - could you check that?

Hi,
it's great to have detailed information about POIs, but I think having an own tag for every type of bread available is too much.
Currently you added 17 different tags, but I know many single bakeries that offer at least 30 different types each. Extrapolating across the world we'll end up with hundreds or a thousand different tags which is just too much for such a minor detail.

Could you start a discussion in the forums to see how the opinion of other mappers is? There already have been several cases of discussions how detailed menues and shop offerings should be mapped - and usually the result was "keep it short".

I personally very much prefer the version you used before, having a single tag with a list of types.

Hi,
what does 'direzione' mean on these bus stops? Is this the number of the bus route? That could be tagged as 'route_ref'.

Hi,
I only fixed a tagging mistake. The "destroyed" tag was added in
changeset/150136820

Exactly right.
If you add a space after ; or not is up to you. It's more readable with a space, but without is equally valid.

I'm going to fix that mistake then.

Hi,
one more remark from me: The syntax with "lang:sr" is only used on destination tags - all name tags have only the language code, but not the "lang" keyword, e.g. alt_name:sr-Latn

If an object has two alternative names, they can be added with one tag, e.g.

alt_name:lang:sr = Шел Адашевци аутопут
alt_name_1:lang:sr = Шел аутопут

->

alt_name:sr = Шел Адашевци аутопут; Шел аутопут

All these nodes don't have valid tags. Please check and fix this.

Hi,
you uploaded a large amount of objects here, but all of them don't have any proper tag.
If you want to add boundaries to OSM, please check how they need to be tagged. And, most importantly, please check our guidelines for importing data:
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

Hi,
you uploaded a large amount of objects here, but all of them don't have any proper tag.
If you want to add boundaries to OSM, please check how they need to be tagged. And, most importantly, please check our guidelines for importing data:
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

Hi,
you added several "cable:*" tags here. These tags don't exist in other places - could you check the wiki for the common tags? Although there is a cable, the usual tags are
socket:type2_cable
socket:type2_combo

Yes, exactly. And even combined with lanes and direction:

destination:lang:sr:lanes:backward

If you're unsure, you can check which tags are already in use on Taginfo:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/destination#similar

Hi,
could you check the destination tags you added recently? The typical order of the parts of the key is

destination:lang:sr:forward

and not

destination:forward:lang:sr

That is, the direction is given after the language.

Hi,
could you check this way? It got a strange "topoogy" tag.
way/1272473914

Hi,
it seems something went wrong here - you uploaded hundreds of nodes without valid tags. I guess this was a mistake and these nodes should be deleted?

Neue Tippfehler in Keys tauchen in meiner Taginfo-basierten Liste auf:
https://osm.janmichel.eu/taginfo/newkeys.htm