OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
47583616 over 8 years ago

Hi, just noting that you seem to have added road surface and lane tags to an MTR metro track. I've removed the tags but you might want to check if you intended to add them to something else.

47583292 over 8 years ago

Hi, just noting that you seem to have added road surface and lane tags to an MTR metro track. I've removed the tags but you might want to check if you intended to add them to something else.

45760620 almost 9 years ago

Hi, you might want to check for redirects / page moves when doing this. zh:藍田站 was a disambiguation page (turned into a redirect) and the Wikidata item wasn't updated (I merged it)

45125548 almost 9 years ago

應該連結是 amenity=waste_basket ,對不起
link should be amenity=waste_basket , sorry

45125548 almost 9 years ago

歡迎您到OpenStreetMap。 我想,如果這是一個垃圾桶它應該用“amenity=waste_basket”(維基:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dwaste_basket)。而且它不雖要用“ID=1”丶“name=Bin1”(真是有名字嗎?)或“status=FULL”。
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I think if this is a trash can it should really use "amenity=waste_basket" (wiki page: amenity=waste_basket); "ID=1", "name=Bin1" (is it really called that?) and "status=FULL" are probably unnecessary.

45182286 almost 9 years ago

Welcome to OSM! Are you sure the footpath goes through all the buildings in a straight line?

44621996 almost 9 years ago

…Actually, never mind.

44621996 almost 9 years ago

You may want to use the easier iD editor instead, especially given that you appear to have difficulty using Potlatch.

44621996 almost 9 years ago

The number of the address does not belong in the addr:street field; it belongs in addr:housenumber.

44621996 almost 9 years ago

Please stop deleting things unnecessarily.

44621346 almost 9 years ago

Reverted, this can't plausibly be changed to the location of a single shop.

44621017 almost 9 years ago

I've reverted your edits in this area, because you seem to have messed up the surrounding roads. I haven't added the shop back because it's not clear from the satellite imagery where it's actually supposed to be.

44619013 almost 9 years ago

I've reverted your changeset (changeset/44621364), although I've added the shop back with proper tagging.

44619013 almost 9 years ago

Hi, you seem to have accidentally deleted a hospital and done various other weird things, please don't do that. Also, you shouldn't be labelling shops with highway tags; and you may want to use shop=furniture instead of shop=showroom because the latter isn't a documented value.

44609065 almost 9 years ago

Hi, from the Bing satellite imagery this doesn't appear to actually exist so I've removed it for now.

44595441 almost 9 years ago

Sorry for accidentally undoing this as well. In future, it would help to add the English name, as well as update the landuse around the building (way/449693730).

44567367 about 9 years ago

No test editing please.

44317325 about 9 years ago

I might be wrong, but aren't there separate speed limits depending on travel direction for some parts of the line?

43938486 about 9 years ago

Line colours are added to the route relations, not the tracks. (The MTRC doesn't paint the physical tracks bright red.)

43803363 about 9 years ago

So I guess the consensus is to tag only the stops as railway=tram_stop and not have railway=halt/station? It seems sensible, if not for the fact that the system is fully bidirectional.