railway=tram_stop is probably a bad idea for the stop positions, causes rendering mess. Maybe better just to use railway=stop

Is this section of the road bus/taxi only?

route=railway might be better for this because it doesn't map an operating service but a railway (group of tracks related to each other).

I'm not sure where you got the data from, but Chinese Wikipedia says the runway is actually 1905 metres long and 37 metres wide.

The road classifications were fine before and you should change them consistently if you really think that they're wrong for some reason. It's not particularly helpful to add "horse=no" on a highway, because that's assumed normally.

Also, the curve in Castle Peak Road does not exist there (Bing/Mapbox satellite imagery).

– Variable speed limits are tagged according to maxspeed=*. Hyphen, unfortunately, isn't allowed because it's not very useful when read by an app
– These roads had the right classification before
– The surface tag isn't really meant for beaches; it's usually for roads.

Why did you retag this as a tram line? "Light rail" is literally right there in the name.

Hi Xavier, removed some of the tags for now because I don't think they should be displayed as stations until the line is actually open.

What the hell are you doing? This is a publicly-viewable map updated in real time, not your own personal play area where you can mess with stuff as you please.

I'll be reverting you again, not because I don't care of your opinion about this but because it's inconsistent to only modify the names of some of the stations.

See https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/52852/railway-stationmetro-station-naming

Not entirely relevant; as an example, this way/194259723 has station signage "OXFORD CIRCUS STATION", but is still marked on the Tube map and in OSM as "Oxford Circus".

Usually railway stations don't contain "station" in their name; this information is already in the "railway=station" tag (see tagging example of railway=station).

I also just picked this changeset to comment on because it was the most recent one when I noticed that he'd made a lot of changesets.

@SomeoneElse I've messaged HelioFelix informing him of the help.osm.org thread, but he hasn't replied yet. Looking at the Cycle layer, 9.8m seems plausible given that Fanling new town is situated in a largely-flat valley.

I've asked the wider community for clarification: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/52388/lots-of-peaks-close-together

Yeah, it does look a bit weird… they are all technically peaks, though. I guess you could prevent them from rendering by just deleting natural=peak (without removing the data)?

I will be reverting the 15 of your changesets, where you (for some reason I don't know) removed elevation data from peaks and troughs, at some point

Where did you get the idea that this was an invalid tag?